MRI Reconstruction with Selective SEMAC Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction is compromised by noise objects, such as metal implants, which cause field distortions, leading to artifacts and reduced image quality due to the need for extensive additional phase-encoding steps in existing correction methods like SEMAC, resulting in low spatial resolution and image degradation.

Innovation Solution

A method that differentiates between correction areas with distortions and standard reconstruction areas without distortions, applying SEMAC correction only where necessary, using a distortion criterion to selectively assign slice data for improved image quality by distinguishing signal and noise components and optimizing reconstruction techniques for each area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If SEMAC correction is applied to correct metal-induced field distortions, then artifact reduction is improved, but measurement time increases significantly due to multiple additional phase-encoding steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact reductionVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies SEMAC correction selectively only to image regions affected by metal artifacts (distorted regions), while leaving unaffected regions to be reconstructed using standard methods. This local differentiation allows artifact correction where needed without incurring the full time penalty of global SEMAC processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The image is segmented into distorted regions (requiring SEMAC correction) and non-distorted regions (amenable to standard reconstruction). This segmentation enables differential processing strategies that optimize both artifact correction and measurement time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If additional phase-encoding steps are performed to resolve distorted excitation profiles, then spatial assignment accuracy is improved, but spatial resolution deteriorates due to low-resolution Fourier transforms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial assignment accuracyVSAvoidspatial resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

High-resolution spatial assignment is applied only to distorted regions where it is necessary for accurate artifact correction, while non-distorted regions maintain their original high spatial resolution. This localized application eliminates the trade-off in unaffected areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying partial phase-encoding steps globally (which would reduce resolution), the patent applies full phase-encoding only locally where distortion exists, maintaining high resolution elsewhere while still achieving accurate spatial assignment where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If slice data from adjacent partition slices are used for SEMAC reconstruction, then distortion correction is improved, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates due to inclusion of noise from outside the target slice

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistortion correctionVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively uses slice data from adjacent partition slices only in distorted regions where distortion correction is beneficial, while excluding such data from non-distorted regions to preserve signal-to-noise ratio. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between correction effectiveness and noise introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent identifies and utilizes the distorted excitation profile itself as a marker to guide where SEMAC correction should be applied. The harmful distortion effect becomes the basis for intelligent, localized correction decisions that avoid unnecessary noise introduction in clean regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances image quality by reducing artifacts and maintaining high signal-to-noise ratio, avoiding the limitations of low-resolution Fourier transforms and signal overshooting, while minimizing the impact of SEMAC correction on undistorted regions.

Implementation Method 1

the object is normally introduced into a constant magnetic field (B0 field) of the magnetic resonance device, specifically into a homogeneity volume thereof in which only very slight deviations from the nominal value of the constant magnetic field are permitted. This causes nuclear spins in the target region to be oriented in the direction of the constant magnetic field.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

the spins are excited (deflected from alignment with the constant magnetic field) by radio-frequency pulses (excitation pulses) generated by a radio-frequency coil arrangement magnetic resonance signals produced by the decay of this excitation are detected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

In order to enable a spatial encoding of the magnetic resonance data, rapidly switched magnetic gradient fields are superimposed on the constant magnetic field, in particular a slice selection gradient that restricts the excitation to one slice to be measured, a phase encoding gradient, and/or a readout gradient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field gradient: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

The raw data present in k-space are converted by a Fourier transformation into the image domain in order to reconstruct a magnetic resonance image data set therefrom.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier transformation:

Data Source

PatentUS10126400B2Method and magnetic resonance apparatus for reconstruction of a three-dimensional image data set from data acquired when a noise object distorted the magnetic field in the apparatus
Publication Date: 2018.11.13 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10126400B2 patent drawing
  • US10126400B2 patent drawing
  • US10126400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for reconstruction of a three-dimensional image data set from magnetic resonance slice data of a target region acquired in target slices while a noise object distorting the magnetic field is present in the target region, for each target slice to be acquired, in addition to a central partition slice corresponding to the respective target slice, location, multiple partition slices adjacent to the central partition slice are acquired in a supplementary encoding direction perpendicular to the slice plane in multiple phase-encoding steps. A correction area and a standard reconstruction area of the target region are determined on the basis of a distortion criterion, obtained by evaluating the slice data that describes the distortion along the supplementary encoding direction. In the standard reconstruction area, only slice data are used, and in the correction area, slice data of partition slices outside the target slice are assigned to target slices in order to correct the distortion.