MRI Shimming via Iterative Weighted Fitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MRI shimming techniques are prone to errors from phase unwrapping and are unsuitable for non-standard magnet designs, leading to suboptimal magnetic field uniformity and dependence on regions that cannot be fitted with available shims.

Innovation Solution

A method involving spatial partial derivatives of residue phase maps and shim functions, radial weight generation, regularization factor selection, and iterative fitting to determine shim coefficients, which can accommodate any magnet design and mitigate unwrapping errors by focusing on regions of high certainty first.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If phase unwrapping is performed to determine shim currents, then magnetic field uniformity can be improved, but errors in phase unwrapping propagate and cause large areas of significant error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field uniformityVSAvoiderror propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnetic field space into multiple regions with different weighting factors. By dividing the fitting process into region-specific calculations rather than a global calculation, errors in phase unwrapping are contained within local regions and do not propagate across the entire field of view. Each region can be independently optimized with appropriate weighting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using spatially varying weighting factors that assign different importance to different regions of the magnetic field. Regions with high signal-to-noise ratio and accurate phase unwrapping receive higher weights, while regions prone to errors receive lower weights. This local differentiation prevents error propagation from affecting the overall field uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If specific polynomial sets are used for determining optimal shim currents, then calculation simplicity is maintained, but the method becomes unsuitable for non-standard magnet designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation simplicityVSAvoidmagnet design compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal shimming method that can accommodate multiple magnet designs including both standard and non-standard configurations. By using a weighted least-squares fitting approach with region-specific weighting factors rather than relying on specific polynomial sets, the method becomes adaptable to various magnet geometries and shim coil arrangements while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed polynomial sets to a flexible weighted fitting method where weighting factors can be adjusted based on the specific magnet design, signal-to-noise characteristics, and region importance. This parameter flexibility allows the same fundamental method to work across different magnet configurations without requiring design-specific polynomial developments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If fitting is performed across all regions equally, then computational efficiency is maintained, but regions with high uncertainty dominate the error and reduce overall precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidfitting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weighting factors to different spatial regions based on their signal-to-noise ratio and phase unwrapping reliability. Regions with high uncertainty receive lower weights, preventing them from dominating the fitting process, while regions with high confidence receive higher weights to improve overall fitting accuracy. This localized weighting maintains computational efficiency while significantly improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If iterative refinement is applied to improve shim coefficient accuracy, then magnetic field uniformity increases, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field uniformityVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating optimal weighting factors based on initial signal-to-noise assessments and phase unwrapping quality metrics before the main fitting process. This preliminary weighting setup enables the iterative refinement to converge faster by preventing error propagation from the outset, thereby reducing the number of iterations needed to achieve the desired field uniformity and cutting overall computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11774530B2System and method for robust shimming for magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 CANON MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US11774530B2 patent drawing
  • US11774530B2 patent drawing
  • US11774530B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To achieve a uniform magnetic field in an MRI system, fitting can be performed using a partially differentiated residue phase map, differentiated shim functions, radial weights, a regularization factor, a discontinuity mask, and/or a signal intensity mask to determine coefficients for shim functions. The fitting can be performed iteratively, where the regularization factor is stronger and the radial weights focus on areas of higher confidence during earlier iterations. During later iterations, the regularization factor gradually gets weaker and the radial weights gradually focus on areas of lower confidence.