MRI Touch Panel Visual Feedback for Hand-Eye Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MRI-compatible touch panel systems, such as those using crosshair/microswitch input methods, fail to provide sufficient feedback for natural handwriting and drawing during fMRI, leading to complex and inefficient input processes, especially for subjects with cognitive impairments, and result in ecologically invalid brain activity patterns.

Innovation Solution

The system provides real-time visual feedback of the subject's hand position and optional force feedback using an MRI-compatible camera to record and process video images, allowing direct and unambiguous input on a touch panel without the need for initial position establishment, enhancing hand-eye coordination and ecological validity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If crosshair/microswitch input method is used, then touch panel input can be recorded during fMRI, but hand-eye coordination is poor and input process is complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand-eye coordinationVSAvoidinput process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time visual feedback by displaying the subject's hand position and touch panel interaction on a screen during fMRI scanning. This feedback loop allows subjects to see their hand movements and adjust their input accordingly, dramatically improving hand-eye coordination and simplifying the input process compared to blind crosshair methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a video camera and display screen as intermediary devices between the subject's hands and the touch panel. This intermediary system captures hand position visually and presents it back to the subject, enabling natural hand-eye coordination without requiring complex direct coupling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If crosshair/microswitch input method is used, then input can be recorded during fMRI, but learning time is prolonged and input efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput efficiencyVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By providing real-time visual feedback of hand position and touch response, the system eliminates the need for extensive practice to learn the crosshair/microswitch mechanism. Subjects can immediately understand the input method through visual demonstration, dramatically reducing learning time and improving input efficiency from the start.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The visual feedback system preliminarily demonstrates the expected hand movements and responses before the subject actually performs the task. This pre-visualization allows subjects to mentally prepare and execute more efficient input actions without needing to learn through trial and error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If crosshair/microswitch input method is used, then touch panel can be operated during fMRI, but ecological validity is compromised due to unnatural input behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveecological validityVSAvoidnaturalness of input
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The real-time visual feedback allows subjects to perform touch panel interactions in a natural, intuitive manner similar to using a regular touchscreen device. This feedback mechanism preserves the ecological validity of the input behavior by enabling natural hand-eye coordination and intuitive touch responses, rather than forcing unnatural crosshair-based interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If visual feedback is provided in real-time, then input accuracy and efficiency improve, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The video camera and display screen serve as intermediary components that handle the complex real-time processing and visual feedback generation. This separates the complex processing tasks from the core fMRI scanning system, allowing high input accuracy through visual feedback without significantly increasing the complexity of the MRI scanning infrastructure itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10582878B2Systems and methods for providing visual feedback of touch panel input during magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 BAYCREST CENT FOR GERIATRIC CARE
  • US10582878B2 patent drawing
  • US10582878B2 patent drawing
  • US10582878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of are disclosed for providing visual feedback to a subject during magnetic resonance imaging, where the visual feedback is associated with input provided by the subject to a magnetic resonance compatible touch panel. A video camera is employed to record video images of the interaction between the subject and the touch panel, and the video images are processed to generate a real-time video signal including a rendering of the input provided to the touch panel and the interaction between the subject's hands and the touch panel. The real-time video signal is provided to the subject as visual feedback, and is displayed within a time duration that is sufficiently fast to avoid the detection of the visual feedback as an error signal with the subject's brain in relation to the sense of proprioception. A measurement of the force applied to the touch panel by the subject may be recorded and employed when rendering the real-time video. The systems and methods may be employed for a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures involving magnetic resonance imaging.