Automated Mass Spectrometer Maintenance via Ionization Source Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated in-vitro diagnostic analyzers, particularly those incorporating mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography, face increased complexity leading to errors, downtimes, and the need for frequent quality control procedures, resulting in reduced productivity and increased costs due to manual intervention and maintenance requirements.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for maintaining a mass spectrometer coupled to liquid chromatography via an ionization source that automatically determines deviations from a QC-compliant status, triggers necessary maintenance procedures, and monitors return to compliance, minimizing downtime and manual intervention by executing maintenance only when required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If frequent quality control procedures are implemented to maintain QC-compliant status, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to reduced effective throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQC-compliant statusVSAvoideffective throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis by automatically monitoring its own operational parameters and detecting deviations from QC-compliant status. The analyzer triggers maintenance procedures autonomously based on real-time performance data, eliminating the need for external service personnel and reducing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operational parameters and provides real-time feedback on QC-compliance status. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment of maintenance timing, allowing the system to maintain reliability while minimizing interruptions to productivity by performing maintenance only when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual intervention by operators or service personnel is performed to fix errors, then reliability is improved, but loss of time worsens due to extended downtimes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The analyzer autonomously detects errors, diagnoses problems, and executes maintenance procedures without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability dramatically reduces downtime by eliminating the time required for human operators to identify and resolve issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions continuously in the background, identifying potential issues before they cause system failure. By detecting and addressing problems early, the system prevents extended downtimes while maintaining reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If preventive maintenance procedures are performed frequently, then reliability is improved, but loss of time worsens due to unnecessary maintenance interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem availabilityVSAvoidmaintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time feedback from operational parameter monitoring to determine when maintenance is actually needed. This eliminates unnecessary preventive maintenance interruptions while ensuring maintenance is performed promptly when required, optimizing the balance between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in operational parameters to detect actual degradation or deviations from compliant status. By basing maintenance decisions on actual parameter changes rather than fixed schedules, the system avoids unnecessary maintenance downtime while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11287402B2Automated method for maintaining a clinical diagnostics system
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS INC
  • US11287402B2 patent drawing
  • US11287402B2 patent drawing
  • US11287402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An analytical system including a mass spectrometer (MS) coupled to liquid chromatography (LC) via an ionization source (IS), and an automated method of maintaining the analytical system in a QC-compliant status are described. The method comprises determining a deviation of the analytical system from a QC-compliant status by determining a deviation of one or more predetermined parameters in an m/z spectrum above one or more predetermined thresholds, triggering an IS and/or MS maintenance procedure upon determining a deviation from the QC-compliant status, determining a return or a failed return to the QC-compliant status during and/or after the IS and/or MS maintenance procedure by determining a return or a failed return respectively of the one or more predetermined parameters in an m/z spectrum below the one or more predetermined thresholds, triggering another IS and/or MS maintenance procedure upon determining a failed return to the QC-compliant status.