Molecularly Self-Assembling Polymer Composite for 3D Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing methods using polymers like ABS and SLS face issues with poor physical properties, warping, weak bonding, moisture absorption, and low recyclability due to high viscosity of polymers, which limits the uniform loading of additives and results in suboptimal 3D printed articles.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of composite materials comprising molecularly self-assembling (MSA) polymers and microfillers, such as organoclays, dispersed in the polymer to create a polymer microfiller composite, which is deposited layer by layer to form three-dimensional objects, optimizing melt viscosity and mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional polymers like ABS or SLS are used in additive manufacturing, then the process is feasible with available materials, but the fabricated articles exhibit poor physical properties, warping, and weak bonding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical properties of fabricated articleVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials consisting of polymer matrices combined with microfillers (such as organoclays, metal oxides, or ceramic particles) to enhance the physical properties of fabricated articles. The microfillers improve mechanical strength, reduce warping, and enhance dimensional stability while maintaining the additive manufacturing process feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If polymer viscosity is reduced to improve melt flow, then easier deposition is achieved, but uniform loading of additives becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelt flow rateVSAvoiduniform additive loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the viscosity parameter of the polymer matrix by selecting specific polymer types and adjusting processing temperatures to achieve a balance between melt flow rate and additive loading uniformity. The composite formulation allows for controlled viscosity that facilitates both deposition and homogeneous distribution of microfillers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If high viscosity polymers are used to maintain structural integrity, then mechanical strength is improved, but melt flow rate decreases limiting additive loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidadditive loading efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates microfillers into the polymer matrix to enhance mechanical strength while the composite structure maintains optimal melt flow characteristics. The microfillers reinforce the polymer, improving tensile strength and rigidity, while the overall composite formulation ensures sufficient fluidity for complete additive loading during the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional polymer materials are used, then material availability is good, but recyclability and moisture resistance are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availabilityVSAvoidmoisture absorption and recyclability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials where microfillers (such as organoclays or metal oxides) are incorporated into the polymer matrix to improve moisture resistance and recyclability. These microfillers reduce moisture absorption by creating a more stable composite structure, and the enhanced material properties facilitate better recyclability compared to conventional polymers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the solid-state properties of 3D printed articles by improving melt flow and mechanical strength while reducing warping and moisture absorption, offering better recyclability and uniform additive loading.

Implementation Method 1

molecularly self-assembling (MSA) materials - MSA materials are oligomers or polymers that effectively form larger associated or assembled oligomers and/or polymers through the physical intermolecular associations of chemical functional groups

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembly: Self-Assembly

Implementation Method 2

non-covalent bonding interactions, often directional, between molecular functional groups or moieties located on individual molecular (i.e. oligomer or polymer) repeat units (e.g. hydrogen-bonded arrays)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3237179B1Method of additive manufacturing using moleculary self-assembling materials and microfillers
Publication Date: 2020.02.19 DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP3237179B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3237179B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3237179B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of fabricating a three-dimensional object, the method comprising (a) providing a polymer microfiller composite comprising a molecularly self-assembling (MSA) material and a microfiller dispersed in the MSA material; (b) depositing the polymer microfiller composite; and (c) repeating the depositing step until the three-dimensional object is formed.