MSD Capability Feedback for Heavy-Duty Vehicle Motion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle motion management systems for heavy-duty vehicles lack fine-grained optimization of motion support device (MSD) coordination, which hinders improvements in energy efficiency, component wear reduction, failure probability, and passenger comfort.

Innovation Solution

An MSD control unit determines limiting and preferred operating points for MSDs, transmitting capability messages to a vehicle motion management (VMM) function to enable optimization of secondary objectives such as energy efficiency, component wear, and passenger comfort, while maintaining compatibility with existing systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the VMM system coordinates MSDs to meet motion requests, then vehicle motion control is achieved, but fine-grained optimization of secondary objectives (energy efficiency, component wear, passenger comfort) is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecondary objective optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The capability information is segmented into multiple levels: limiting operating points (hard constraints) and preferred operating points (soft preferences). This segmentation allows the VMM system to optimize secondary objectives by selecting from preferred operating points while ensuring hard constraints are met, without requiring complete redesign of the control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The MSD control units pre-determine and report both limiting and preferred operating points to the VMM system before the actual coordination task. This preliminary provision of capability information enables the VMM system to perform fine-grained optimization of secondary objectives without real-time computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Use of energy by moving object

If the MSD control unit reports only limiting operating points, then system compatibility is maintained, but optimization of energy efficiency and component wear is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcapability information completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The capability information is enhanced with local quality details through the addition of preferred operating points for different secondary objectives (energy efficiency, component wear, passenger comfort). Each MSD control unit provides tailored capability information specific to its characteristics, enabling the VMM system to make informed optimization decisions without losing compatibility with existing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the system coordinates multiple MSDs to achieve desired vehicle motion, then motion control is achieved, but component wear and failure probability increase due to lack of optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent durabilityVSAvoidcoordination flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The MSD control units provide feedback capability information including both limiting and preferred operating points to the VMM system. This feedback mechanism enables the VMM system to coordinate MSDs in a way that optimizes component durability by preferentially selecting operating points that reduce wear and stress, while maintaining coordination flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If the VMM system uses traditional capability reports, then system simplicity is maintained, but passenger comfort and energy efficiency cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger comfortVSAvoidcapability message complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The capability message structure is made dynamic by including optional preferred operating point information that can be adapted to different secondary objectives. The VMM system can dynamically select and weight different preferred operating points based on current operational requirements, enabling optimization of passenger comfort and energy efficiency without rigid system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250091582A1Heavy-duty vehicle motion support device capability feedback
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US20250091582A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091582A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091582A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control unit for controlling at least one MSD on a heavy-duty vehicle is provided. The control unit is arranged to determine a limiting operating point of the MSD associated with a performance limit of the MSD, determine a preferred operating point of the MSD indicative of an operating point of the MSD associated with an improvement in a secondary objective function value compared to the limiting operating point, and transmit a capability message to a VMM function comprising the limiting operating point of the MSD and the preferred operating point of the MSD.