Two-Step Random Access MsgB Format for Reduced Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing four-step random access procedure in LTE and NR systems is cumbersome and leads to longer delays for terminal devices, necessitating a more efficient two-step random access procedure.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution defines the format of msgB in the two-step random access procedure to include UE contention resolution ID information, dedicated RNTI, uplink timing advance information, or uplink scheduling information, enabling effective response to multiple or single UEs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a four-step random access procedure is used, then the random access procedure is complete and reliable, but the procedure is cumbersome and causes longer delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom access completionVSAvoidaccess delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges msg1 and msg3 into a single message A transmitted by the UE, and merges msg2 and msg4 into a single message B transmitted by the network device. This combining of multiple steps into fewer steps directly reduces the access delay while maintaining the essential functions of contention resolution and random access completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments message B into multiple parts or formats that can handle different scenarios (responding to one UE or multiple UEs). By dividing the response mechanism into different formats within msgB, the system maintains reliability for various random access scenarios while reducing the overall procedure steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If msgB responds to multiple UEs, then the response efficiency is improved, but the message format complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse efficiencyVSAvoidmessage format
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs message B with universal formats that can serve multiple purposes: it can respond to a single UE or multiple UEs, and can include different types of information (contention resolution ID, dedicated RNTI, uplink timing advance, uplink scheduling information) based on the scenario. This multi-functionality allows efficient responses without requiring entirely separate message formats for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic message B formats that can be flexibly configured based on the number of UEs and the specific random access scenario. The message structure can adaptively include or exclude certain information elements, allowing efficient responses to multiple UEs when needed while maintaining simpler formats for single-UE scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If msgB includes all necessary information elements, then the contention resolution is effective, but the message size and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontention resolutionVSAvoidmessage size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by including different information elements in message B based on the specific scenario and UE requirements. Not all UEs need all information elements - the message format includes only the necessary components for each particular case, such as including contention resolution ID only when needed, or dedicated RNTI only for specific scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by including only the necessary subset of information elements in message B for each specific scenario rather than always including all possible elements. This allows effective contention resolution with the minimum required information, reducing message size while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12289768B2Random access method and apparatus, user equipment, and network device
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD
  • US12289768B2 patent drawing
  • US12289768B2 patent drawing
  • US12289768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The implementations of the present application provide a random access method and apparatus, a user equipment (UE), and a network device. The method comprises: a UE sends a first message to a network device; the UE receives a second message sent by the network device, the second message being used for responding to the first messages of one or more UEs, and the second message comprising at least one of: UE conflict resolution identification information, a dedicated radio network temporary identifier (RNTI), uplink timing advance information, and uplink scheduling information.