AI Control Platform for Stable MSWI Optimization and Safety Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) plants face challenges in maintaining stable optimization conditions due to the variability of expert experience, leading to instability and inefficiency, and the lack of effective AI integration for safety collaboration across cloud, edge, and end sides, which affects industrial control safety and environmental compliance.

Innovation Solution

An AI evaluation platform integrating a synchronous publishing system, AI-driven modeling system, AI control system for multiple-input multiple-output loops, AI control system for edge-side safety isolation, and AI optimization system for cloud-side safety isolation, enabling closed-loop operations and multi-layer security isolation for data transmission, and supporting intelligent control and optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control by domain experts is used, then operational flexibility and experience-based adjustments are maintained, but stability and consistency of the incineration process deteriorate due to randomness and variability in expert experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidprocess stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin of the physical incineration system that copies and simulates the complex thermal, chemical, and mechanical processes. This digital model enables consistent reproduction of optimal operating conditions without relying on variable human expertise, thereby maintaining operational flexibility while improving process stability through automated control based on the digital twin simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control operations with an automated control system that uses machine learning models and digital twin simulations. The system substitutes human expert judgment with algorithmic decision-making, eliminating the randomness and variability inherent in manual operations while maintaining the ability to adapt to changing conditions through automated adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If AI technology is integrated for intelligent control, then process stability and optimization are improved, but industrial control safety and data security deteriorate due to potential vulnerabilities in AI systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimization stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a safety isolation mechanism that acts as an intermediary layer between the AI control system and the industrial control network. This intermediary layer includes safety validation modules that verify AI-generated control commands before execution, and isolation firewalls that prevent direct network access to critical control systems, thereby enabling AI integration while mitigating security risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preemptive security measures including AI model validation, control command verification, and network isolation protocols before AI technology is deployed in the industrial control system. These beforehand cushioning measures prepare the system to handle potential AI vulnerabilities by establishing safety boundaries and validation procedures in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring and adjustment by domain experts is implemented, then response to unexpected situations improves, but operational costs and time consumption increase due to the need for uninterrupted expert attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse capability to unexpected situationsVSAvoidtime consumption for continuous monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the incineration system to monitor and adjust its own operation through the digital twin and automated control system. The system continuously monitors process parameters, detects anomalies, and makes real-time adjustments without requiring continuous human intervention. This self-service capability maintains high response capability to unexpected situations while eliminating the time consumption associated with continuous expert monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where process data is continuously collected, analyzed by the digital twin model, and used to automatically adjust control parameters. The feedback mechanism enables the system to respond to unexpected situations in real-time by detecting deviations from optimal operation and automatically correcting them, replacing the need for continuous human monitoring with an automated feedback-driven control loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If AI-driven closed-loop operations are implemented, then operational efficiency and cost reduction are achieved, but system complexity and difficulty of implementation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex AI control system into modular components including the digital twin model, data collection modules, analysis engines, and control execution interfaces. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently developed, tested, and deployed. This segmentation reduces implementation complexity by breaking down the overall system into manageable units while maintaining the high operational efficiency of the integrated AI-driven closed-loop operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260017741A1Ai evaluation platform for municipal solid waste incineration
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 BEIJING UNIV OF TECH
  • US20260017741A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017741A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017741A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an artificial intelligence (AI) evaluation platform for municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI). The AI evaluation platform for municipal solid waste incineration includes: An AI-driven modeling system of multimodal data is connected to an AI optimization system for cloud-side safety isolation and a synchronous publishing system of multimodal historical data, the synchronous publishing system of multimodal historical data is connected to an AI control system for edge-side safety isolation, and the AI control system for edge-side safety isolation is connected to an AI control system of an end-side multiple-input multiple-output loop and the AI optimization system for cloud-side safety isolation. This application resolves, in conventional technologies, a problem that “AI+MSWI” digital industry clusters cannot implement safety collaboration on a cloud side, an edge side, and an end side, and a problem that MSWI plants are difficult to maintain stable optimization conditions for a long period of time.