MSWI Bottom Ash in Portland Cement Kiln Feed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The integration of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash into cement production in the US faces challenges due to uncertainties regarding environmental risks and end product performance, particularly with regards to mechanical strength, leaching of constituents, and changes in cement mineralogy and hydration properties, with limited research on the use of MSWI bottom ash as a cement kiln feed.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of MSWI bottom ash as a raw material in cement production, where it makes up about 2.8% by mass of the kiln feed, subjected to metals recovery and filtration, and processed in a full-scale dry process kiln to form ash-amended clinker and cement, meeting ASTM standards, with additional gypsum added during the finish milling process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If MSWI bottom ash is used as a raw material in cement production, then landfill waste reduction is improved, but environmental risks and leaching of constituents may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelandfill waste reductionVSAvoidenvironmental risks and leaching
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful MSWI bottom ash, which contains heavy metals and chlorides, into a beneficial cement raw material. The ash is processed through a cement kiln where high-temperature treatment stabilizes potentially harmful constituents, transforming waste into a useful product that reduces landfill burden while controlling environmental risks through established cement manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the composition of MSWI bottom ash in the kiln feed (maintaining at or below 5% by mass) and adjusting processing parameters such as temperature, residence time, and chemical composition ratios. These parameter controls ensure that the final cement product meets ASTM standards while managing leaching risks of heavy metals and other constituents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If MSWI bottom ash is incorporated into cement production, then material recycling is improved, but mechanical strength and hydration properties may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial recycling efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical strength and hydration properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by incorporating MSWI bottom ash at controlled levels (at or below 5% by mass in the kiln feed) rather than using it as a primary raw material. This partial incorporation allows the cement to maintain its required mechanical strength and hydration properties while still achieving meaningful waste recycling goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes processing parameters including kiln temperature, residence time, and chemical composition ratios to ensure that even with MSWI bottom ash incorporation, the resulting clinker and cement meet ASTM C150 and C595 standards for mechanical strength and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach demonstrates the feasibility of using MSWI bottom ash in cement production, showing comparable physical and environmental performance to traditional cement, with no significant increase in leaching risks and potential for reducing landfill waste and mining needs, while offering cost savings and environmental benefits.

Implementation Method 1

forming ash-amended clinker (ACK) by heating the raw kiln feed in the industrial cement production kiln

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a finish mill that grinds ash-amended clinker (ACK) formed by heating the raw kiln feed in the industrial cement production kiln to form ash-amended cement (AAC)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrinding: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS20240182362A1Portland cement manufacture using municipal solid waste incineration ash
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US20240182362A1 patent drawing
  • US20240182362A1 patent drawing
  • US20240182362A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples related to portland cement manufacturing using municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash are provided. In one example, a method includes providing a raw kiln feed including MSWI to a kiln, forming ash-amended clinker (ACK) by heating the raw kiln feed in the kiln, and preparing ash-amended cement (AAC) from the ACK. The MSWI bottom ash can make up about 5% by mass or less of the raw kiln feed. The ACK can have a chemical composition that meets ASTM C150/ASTM C595, and the AAC can include arsenic, barium, copper, and lead consistent with defined Soil Cleanup Target Levels. In another example, a system includes a kiln, a kiln feed system that supplies raw kiln feed including MSWI bottom ash to the kiln, and a finish mill that grinds ACK formed by heating the raw kiln feed in the kiln to form AAC.