MTA-Uncompetitive PRMT5 Inhibitors for MTAP-Deleted Cancer Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PRMT5 inhibitors lack selectivity for MTAP-deleted cancer cells due to their mechanisms of action as SAM-uncompetitive or SAM-competitive inhibitors, failing to leverage the accumulation of MTA caused by MTAP deletion, which is a common event in various cancers.

Innovation Solution

Development of a compound that binds to PRMT5 in an MTA-uncompetitive manner, exploiting the accumulation of MTA in MTAP-deleted cells to achieve selective inhibition, thereby targeting cancer cells with loss-of-function mutations or deletion of tumor suppressor genes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PRMT5 inhibitors are developed as SAM-uncompetitive or SAM-competitive inhibitors, then they can effectively inhibit PRMT5 activity, but they lack selectivity for MTAP-deleted cancer cells

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePRMT5 inhibition efficacyVSAvoidSelectivity for MTAP-deleted cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the binding mechanism parameter from SAM-competitive or SAM-uncompetitive inhibition to MTA-uncompetitive inhibition. This parameter change allows the inhibitor to exploit the accumulated MTA levels in MTAP-deleted cells, achieving both effective PRMT5 inhibition and selective targeting of MTAP-deleted cancer cells

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses MTA as an intermediary molecule to achieve selective inhibition. By designing an MTA-uncompetitive inhibitor, the drug requires MTA binding to PRMT5 first, then the inhibitor binds to the MTA-PRMT5 complex. This intermediary mechanism ensures that only cells with accumulated MTA (MTAP-deleted cells) are selectively targeted

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If current PRMT5 inhibitors are used, then they can inhibit PRMT5 activity in all cells, but they fail to leverage the accumulation of MTA in MTAP-deleted cells

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePRMT5 inhibitionVSAvoidTherapeutic selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful collateral deletion of MTAP (which causes MTA accumulation and cellular vulnerability) into a beneficial selective target. By designing MTA-uncompetitive inhibitors, the therapy exploits the MTA accumulation caused by MTAP deletion to achieve selective cancer cell killing while sparing normal cells with intact MTAP

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11986471B2Compounds and methods of use
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 TANGO THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US11986471B2 patent drawing
  • US11986471B2 patent drawing
  • US11986471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compounds are provided according to Formula (I):and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, and pharmaceutical compositions thereof; wherein X1, X2, X3, X4, Y, A, L1, L2, R1, R2, R5, m and n are as defined herein. Compounds of the present invention are contemplated useful for the prevention and treatment of a variety of conditions.