MTA-Uncompetitive PRMT5 Compounds for MTAP-Deleted Cell Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PRMT5 inhibitors lack selectivity for MTAP-deleted cancer cell lines due to their mechanisms of action, which are either SAM-uncompetitive or SAM-competitive, failing to leverage the accumulation of MTA caused by MTAP-deletion.

Innovation Solution

Development of PRMT5 inhibitors that bind in an MTA-uncompetitive manner, leveraging the accumulation of MTA to selectively target MTAP-deleted cancer cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PRMT5 inhibitors with SAM-uncompetitive or SAM-competitive mechanisms are used, then PRMT5 inhibition is achieved, but selectivity for MTAP-deleted cancer cells is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePRMT5 inhibition efficacyVSAvoidLack of selectivity for MTAP-deleted cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the binding mechanism parameter from SAM-uncompetitive or SAM-competitive to MTA-uncompetitive binding. This parameter change allows the inhibitor to specifically recognize and bind to PRMT5 in the context of MTA accumulation, which occurs only in MTAP-deleted cells, thereby achieving both PRMT5 inhibition and selective targeting of MTAP-deleted cancer cells

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses MTA as an intermediary molecule. Instead of directly targeting PRMT5 with conventional inhibitors, the invention designs an inhibitor that binds uncompetitively with MTA, leveraging MTA as a mediator to achieve selective inhibition. The accumulated MTA in MTAP-deleted cells acts as a unique identifier that enables selective drug binding and inhibition of PRMT5 activity specifically in these cancer cells

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional PRMT5 inhibitors are developed, then PRMT5 activity is inhibited, but the accumulation of MTA in MTAP-deleted cells is not leveraged

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePRMT5 inhibitionVSAvoidAbility to leverage MTA accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the binding mechanism parameter from conventional SAM-based inhibition to MTA-uncompetitive binding. This allows the drug to adapt to and leverage the unique metabolic state of MTAP-deleted cells (MTA accumulation) rather than simply inhibiting PRMT5 activity in all cells regardless of their metabolic state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the drug to self-select its target cells through the MTA-uncompetitive binding mechanism. The accumulated MTA in MTAP-deleted cells serves as a built-in selection mechanism that automatically directs the inhibitor to the appropriate cancer cells without requiring external selection criteria or complex delivery systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12403137B2Compounds and methods of use
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 TANGO THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US12403137B2 patent drawing
  • US12403137B2 patent drawing
  • US12403137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compounds are provided according to Formula (I): and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, and pharmaceutical compositions thereof: wherein X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, A, L, R1, R2, R5, m and n are as defined herein. Compounds of the present invention are contemplated useful for the prevention and treatment of a variety of conditions.