MTI Radar Parallel Processing Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing moving target indicator (MTI) systems face limitations in detection range and are computationally expensive, often suffering from noise interference and inefficiencies in processing and communication.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of parallel processing techniques and enhanced beam sweeping algorithms in MTI radar systems, which reduce computational expense and complexity by avoiding expensive inter-processor communication and improving detection range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by stationary object

If traditional MTI systems use sequential processing with inter-processor communication, then detection range can be maintained, but computational expense and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational power usageVSAvoiddetection range
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the MTI processing into separate functional modules: clutter rejection processing, Doppler processing, and target detection processing. Each module operates independently on its own data buffer without requiring inter-processor communication, thereby reducing computational overhead while maintaining detection range capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary clutter rejection processing on received radar signals before Doppler processing and target detection. By pre-processing and removing clutter components early in the signal chain, the system reduces the computational burden on subsequent processing stages while preserving target detection sensitivity at extended ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If MTI systems perform comprehensive signal processing to improve target detection accuracy, then detection precision increases, but processing complexity and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements separate functional processing modules for clutter rejection, Doppler analysis, and target detection. Each module handles specific processing tasks independently with dedicated data buffers, achieving comprehensive signal processing without increasing overall system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and removes clutter components from radar signals through dedicated clutter rejection processing before subsequent target detection stages. By separating clutter removal as a distinct preprocessing function, the system achieves high detection accuracy without burdening the entire processing chain with complex clutter handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If MTI systems use multiple processing modules with data sharing, then detection capability improves, but inter-processor communication overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates distinct processing modules (clutter rejection, Doppler, target detection) with separate data buffers for each stage. This segmentation allows parallel processing of radar signals through multiple modules without requiring frequent data sharing or inter-processor communication, thereby maintaining detection capability while minimizing communication overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of sharing data buffers between processing modules, the system creates separate copies of data structures for each processing stage. Each module operates on its own dedicated buffer, eliminating the need for inter-processor data sharing and communication while maintaining full detection functionality through independent processing paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250189654A1Ground moving target indicator detection system
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 RAYTHEON CO
  • US20250189654A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189654A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A moving target indicator radar system can include a radar transceiver. The system can further include processing circuitry. The processing circuitry can provide a command to move an antenna beam in an azimuth direction. The processing circuitry can further control the radar transceiver to transmit a series of pulses throughout antenna beam motion such that the series of pulses are assembled into Coherent Processing Intervals (CPIs) and such that for a possible target, sequential sets of CPIs are combined covering at least a 3 dB portion an azimuth beam. The processing circuitry can further detect at least one moving target in at least one CPI. Other apparatuses and methods are also described.