Magnetic Tunnel Junction Control Wire for Spintronic Logic Cascading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Spintronic technologies face challenges in general-purpose computing due to difficulties in direct cascading of logic gates, requiring additional circuit elements like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors that consume significant power, processing time, and area.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic tunnel junction device is developed, comprising a MTJ element with a top and bottom ferromagnet layer and a tunneling layer, along with a control wire that reverses the magnetization direction of the top ferromagnet layer without affecting the bottom ferromagnet layer, enabling direct cascading of logic gates without additional amplification or control logic stages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If additional circuit elements like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors are used to enable logic gate cascading, then logic gates can be connected in sequence, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic gate cascading capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors from the spintronic logic gate cascading system. By using magnetic tunnel junctions with controlled magnetization switching, the invention removes the power-consuming CMOS transistor components while maintaining the ability to cascade logic gates directly, thus resolving the contradiction between cascading capability and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electrical CMOS transistor switching mechanism with a magnetic field-based magnetization switching mechanism. The spintronic logic gates use magnetization direction changes in magnetic tunnel junctions instead of electrical current flow through CMOS transistors, substituting a magnetic control mechanism that consumes less power while achieving the same logic gate cascading function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If additional circuit elements like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors are used to enable logic gate cascading, then logic gates can be connected in sequence, but the circuit area increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic gate cascading capabilityVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors from the spintronic logic gate cascading system. By using magnetic tunnel junctions with controlled magnetization switching, the invention removes the area-consuming CMOS transistor components while maintaining the ability to cascade logic gates directly, thus resolving the contradiction between cascading capability and circuit area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the logic gate functionality with the magnetic tunnel junction structure, eliminating the need for separate CMOS transistor components. The spintronic logic gate directly integrates the computing element and the cascading interface, combining multiple functions into a single compact structure that reduces overall circuit area while maintaining cascading capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If additional circuit elements like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors are used to enable logic gate cascading, then logic gates can be connected in sequence, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic gate cascading capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for complementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistors from the spintronic logic gate cascading system. By using magnetic tunnel junctions with controlled magnetization switching, the invention removes the time-consuming CMOS transistor switching stages while maintaining the ability to cascade logic gates directly, thus resolving the contradiction between cascading capability and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous operation of spintronic logic gates by directly cascading the output of one gate to the input of the next without intermediate CMOS transistor stages. The magnetization switching in magnetic tunnel junctions provides continuous useful action for logic gate operation, eliminating the discontinuous time delays associated with additional transistor switching stages and enabling faster processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for efficient direct cascading of logic gates, reducing power consumption and area requirements, thereby enhancing the performance and efficiency of spintronic logic circuits.

Implementation Method 1

The control wire is configured to conduct a charge pulse. A direction of charge flow in the control wire extends substantially perpendicular to a magnetization direction of the top ferromagnet layer. The control wire is positioned sufficiently close to the top ferromagnet layer to reverse the magnetization direction of the top ferromagnet layer when the charge pulse flows therethrough

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The MTJ element includes, but is not limited to, a top ferromagnet layer formed of a first magnetic material, a tunneling layer, and a bottom ferromagnet layer formed of a second magnetic material. The tunneling layer is mounted between the top ferromagnet layer and the bottom ferromagnet layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin-dependent tunneling: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS9299917B2Magnetic tunnel junctions with control wire
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 NORTHWESTERN UNIV
  • US9299917B2 patent drawing
  • US9299917B2 patent drawing
  • US9299917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) device is provided that includes a MTJ element and a control wire. The MTJ element includes a top ferromagnet layer formed of a first magnetic material, a tunneling layer, and a bottom ferromagnet layer formed of a second magnetic material. The tunneling layer is mounted between the top ferromagnet layer and the bottom ferromagnet layer. The control wire is configured to conduct a charge pulse. A direction of charge flow in the control wire extends substantially perpendicular to a magnetization direction of the top ferromagnet layer. The control wire is positioned sufficiently close to the top ferromagnet layer to reverse the magnetization direction of the top ferromagnet layer when the charge pulse flows therethrough while not reversing the magnetization direction of the bottom ferromagnet layer when the charge pulse flows therethrough.