MTJ Spin Torque Enhancing Layer for Low Current Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) devices face challenges in reducing critical switching current density while maintaining tunneling magnetoresistance, due to high serial resistance from spin barrier layers, which limits power consumption and chip area efficiency in STT-MRAM technologies.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a nano-oxide layer as a spin torque enhancing layer between the free layer and the top metal contact in MTJ devices, which reduces the effective damping constant without increasing serial resistance, thereby decreasing the critical switching current density without compromising tunneling magnetoresistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a spin barrier layer is inserted between the free layer and top electrical contact to reduce the effective damping constant, then the critical switching current density decreases, but the serial resistance increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical switching current densityVSAvoidserial resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition and thickness parameters of the barrier layer, transitioning from conventional thick insulating oxides to ultra-thin barriers (0.5-2 nm) with specific materials like AlOx, TiOx, or TaOx that provide lower resistance while maintaining spin barrier functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite barrier structures combining multiple materials (e.g., AlOx/TiOx, TaOx/WOx) where each layer contributes different properties - one layer provides spin barrier effect while another provides low resistance, achieving both reduced damping and low serial resistance simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Use of energy by moving object

If the thickness of the free layer is reduced to decrease the critical switching current density, then the switching current decreases, but the tunneling magnetoresistance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical switching current densityVSAvoidtunneling magnetoresistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the free layer thickness to a specific range (3-6 nm) and adjusts the tunnel barrier thickness (0.5-2 nm) to maintain high TMR while keeping the switching current low. The precise control of these parameters allows simultaneous achievement of low power consumption and high signal margin

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If the effective damping constant is reduced to enable low power consumption, then the critical switching current density decreases, but the chip area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidchip area
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By modifying the damping constant through material selection and barrier engineering, the patent reduces the switching current density, allowing smaller current margins and thus smaller transistor sizes, which ultimately reduces the overall chip area required for the MRAM cell

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables lower power consumption, smaller chip area, and higher density memory arrays by reducing the critical switching current density while preserving tunneling magnetoresistance, facilitating lower power operation and higher clock frequencies.

Implementation Method 1

According to a spin-torque-transfer model, Jc is proportional to an effective damping constant (αeff), a saturation magnetization (MS), and a thickness (tfree) of the free layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin torque transfer:

Implementation Method 2

tunneling barrier means for providing conduction electrons to the means for storing by quantum mechanical tunneling of conduction electrons through a barrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum mechanical tunneling:

Implementation Method 3

High serial resistance lowers the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) of the MTJ device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTunneling magnetoresistance: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentEP2441100B1Magnetic tunnel junction device and fabrication
Publication Date: 2016.01.06 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP2441100B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2441100B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2441100B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) device and fabrication method is disclosed. In a particular embodiment, an apparatus is disclosed that includes an MTJ device. The MTJ device includes a free layer and a spin torque enhancing layer. The spin torque enhancing layer includes a nano oxide layer.