MU-MIMO Group Selection via Compressed CSI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The actual throughput of MU-MIMO networks varies widely due to sub-optimal grouping of client devices, leading to potential throughput gains not being fully realized, often due to inter-user interference, and existing methods require full channel state information which is costly or not supported in standards like IEEE 802.11ac.

Innovation Solution

The use of compressed channel state information to estimate signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) and consider bandwidth settings to optimize MU-MIMO group selection, employing techniques like exhaustive, pruned-exhaustive, and informed greedy selection processes to reduce processing and communication overhead while achieving optimal groupings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full channel state information is used for MU-MIMO group selection, then grouping accuracy is improved, but processing complexity and communication overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential components needed for SINR estimation from full channel state information. Instead of using complete channel matrices, the system extracts compressed CSI that contains sufficient statistics for accurate SINR calculation, thereby reducing processing complexity while maintaining grouping accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs compressed channel state information as a lightweight alternative to full channel state information. This compressed representation is sufficient for the intended purpose (SINR estimation and group selection) without requiring the expensive and complex full CSI processing, effectively using a disposable approximation to solve the problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If more client devices are grouped together in MU-MIMO, then throughput is improved, but inter-user interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidinter-user interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses SINR estimation based on compressed channel state information to continuously monitor and evaluate the quality of MU-MIMO group transmissions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to identify when inter-user interference becomes excessive and adjust group compositions accordingly, enabling the system to maximize throughput while controlling harmful interference levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts grouping parameters based on estimated SINR values. By changing which client devices are grouped together based on real-time channel conditions and SINR predictions, the system can optimize the balance between throughput and inter-user interference, adapting group compositions to minimize harmful factors while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If compressed channel state information is used for SINR estimation, then communication overhead is reduced, but estimation accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication overheadVSAvoidSINR estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a compressed copy of the essential channel state information needed for SINR estimation. This compressed CSI contains the critical statistical properties and channel characteristics required for accurate interference and noise estimation, while discarding redundant information that would increase communication overhead without providing additional estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10171140B2MU-MIMO group selection
Publication Date: 2019.01.01 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10171140B2 patent drawing
  • US10171140B2 patent drawing
  • US10171140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example communications device includes communications circuitry and control circuitry. The communications circuitry may wirelessly communicate with client devices. The control circuitry may determine signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINRs) for the client devices based on compressed client-side channel state information received from the client devices. The control circuitry may select, based on the SINRs and in consideration of multiple possible bandwidth settings, a set of multi-user-multiple-input-multiple-output (MU-MIMO) groups each with an assigned bandwidth setting.