Mudguard Assembly With Integrated Recessed Mounting Region

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mudguard assemblies for agricultural vehicles are complex and costly to manufacture, require extensive supporting structures, and often necessitate different designs for each side of the vehicle, increasing production costs and component inventory.

Innovation Solution

A mudguard assembly featuring a main body member with a recessed mounting region and a telescopically adjustable support system, allowing for closer positioning to the wheel and improved structural rigidity, enabling simpler and more cost-effective design with symmetrical components for use on either side of the vehicle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a complex supporting structure with a frame portion extending over a large area is used to provide structural support for the mudguard, then the mudguard can maintain its shape, but the manufacturing cost increases and assembly becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemudguard shape maintenanceVSAvoidsupporting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting region is integrated directly into the main body member as a raised formation with a recess, combining the support function with the mudguard body itself. This eliminates the need for a separate complex frame structure while maintaining shape stability through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The support function is extracted from a separate complex frame structure and incorporated into the main body member through the raised mounting region with recess. This simplifies the overall structure by removing unnecessary components while retaining the essential support capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Strength

If a complex supporting structure is used to hold the mudguard in position, then structural support is provided, but the spacing between the lower surface of the mudguard and the wheel increases, reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidmudguard effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting region is merged with the main body member, allowing the mudguard to be positioned closer to the wheel without requiring a separate support structure. This integration maintains both structural integrity and mudguard effectiveness in preventing spray.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If different mudguards and supporting structures are required for each side of the vehicle, then each side can be optimized, but manufacturing costs and component inventory increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside-specific optimizationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mudguard is designed with asymmetrical features including the positioning of the mounting region and the angled lateral section of the support, allowing a single design to fit both sides of the vehicle. The asymmetrical geometry enables proper positioning on either side while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The mudguard assembly is designed as a universal component that can be used on either side of the vehicle. The mounting region with its specific geometry and the angled lateral section of the support enable the same component to function correctly on both left and right sides, reducing inventory requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the mudguard is positioned closer to the wheel to improve spray prevention, then effectiveness increases, but the supporting structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray prevention effectivenessVSAvoidsupporting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support function is merged into the main body member through the raised mounting region with recess, enabling the mudguard to be positioned closer to the wheel. This integration provides structural support without requiring a separate complex supporting structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4261108B1Mudguard assembly
Publication Date: 2024.07.17 AGCO INT GMBH
  • EP4261108B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4261108B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4261108B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A mudguard assembly (11) for a tractor includes a mudguard (12) with main body member (14) and a tubular support (13) for mounting the mudguard to a structural component of the vehicle. The main body member (14) is curved longitudinally so as to extend over a wheel of the vehicle and has mounting region (17) which defines a recess with a downwardly facing opening in which at least part of a mudguard mounting portion of the support is located. The mounting portion (17) is in the form of a raised channel formation which provides structural rigidity for the main body member. A separate cover (19) may be attachable over the mounting portion.