Self-Acting Mule Segmented Carriage for Energy Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional self-acting mules have limitations in flexibility, productivity, and energy use due to their intrinsic construction and reliance on a single control unit and motor configuration, leading to high downtimes and energy consumption, especially with increased spindle numbers.

Innovation Solution

The self-acting mule is divided into independent sections, each with its own motorized components and optional autonomous control unit, allowing for separate operation and reduced energy consumption, enabling more efficient loading and production with reduced downtimes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single control unit and motor configuration is used to move the self-acting mule as a single body, then the machine structure is simple and easy to control, but the energy consumption is high with peaks reaching up to 140% of nominal power and the machine has intermittent functioning with frequent accelerations and decelerations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The self-acting mule is divided into at least two independent sections, each with its own motor and control unit. Each section can operate autonomously with continuous motion, eliminating the need for frequent start-stop cycles. This segmentation allows each motor to run at more constant speeds, reducing energy peaks and improving overall energy efficiency while maintaining simpler individual control units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the self-acting mule is divided into independent sections with separate motors and control units, then energy consumption is reduced and productivity increases, but the device complexity and number of components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of motors and control units
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is segmented into independent sections that can operate simultaneously and autonomously. Each section has its own motor and control unit, allowing continuous operation without waiting for other sections to complete cycles. This increases productivity by eliminating idle time while the modular design keeps each individual section relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each section is equipped with its own control unit that can independently manage loading, processing, and unloading operations. This preliminary preparation of independent control capabilities allows each section to operate continuously without waiting for centralized coordination, improving productivity while distributing control complexity across multiple simpler units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the machine operates as a single body with centralized control, then the control system is simple, but the flexibility to handle different assortments and production requirements is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system configurationVSAvoidflexibility in production
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the machine into independent sections with separate control units enables each section to be configured and operated independently for different production requirements. This segmentation provides flexibility to handle different assortments, yarn types, and production volumes simultaneously, while each control unit remains relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The independent sections can dynamically adjust their operating parameters, speeds, and cycles based on specific production requirements. Each section can be optimized for different tasks (e.g., one section for high-volume standard yarn, another for small-batch specialty yarn), providing versatility while maintaining simple individual control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If frequent accelerations and decelerations are used in the intermittent functioning of the machine, then the machine can handle loading and unloading cycles, but energy peaks reach up to 140% of nominal power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and unloading capabilityVSAvoidenergy peaks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Each independent section maintains continuous motion during its operational cycle, eliminating the need for frequent start-stop accelerations and decelerations. The carriage, spindles, and other components in each section move continuously at optimized speeds, significantly reducing energy peaks while maintaining effective loading and unloading capabilities through coordinated independent operation of multiple sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP1728901B1Self-acting mule
Publication Date: 2012.02.22 PROXIMA SRL
  • EP1728901B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1728901B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Self-acting mule (10) used to produce yarns in general, and particularly for the production of quality yarns in weaving and knitwear. The self-acting mule (10) consists of at least two sections of machine, respectively left (11) and right (12), independent from each other from the mechanical point of view, and each comprising at least a relative spool-bearing carriage (19a, 19b), relative spindles (14), relative cylinders (21a, 21b), relative fallers (24a, 24b), relative counter-fallers (26a, 26b), and relative drums for unwinding the spools (23a, 23b).