Multi-Account Transaction Management System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional transaction management systems fail to dynamically and automatically manage transactions based on the terms and events of multiple accounts, limiting the ability to maximize benefits for individuals.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that processes information from multiple accounts to automatically perform transactions based on trigger conditions, utilizing a processing unit and memory unit to receive, process, and transmit account information, allowing for dynamic management of transactions across various accounts to optimize benefits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional transaction management systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but the ability to dynamically manage transactions based on multiple account terms and events is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage transactions based on multiple account termsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments transaction management by creating separate modules: account information reception module, trigger condition determination module, and transaction execution module. Each module handles specific aspects of multi-account management, allowing the system to process complex multi-account transactions while maintaining manageable system architecture through functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transaction management system is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple account types (checking, savings, credit cards, investment accounts) and various transaction scenarios (transfers, payments, investments) through a single integrated system. The system universally processes trigger conditions across different account types using the same architectural framework, enabling adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If manual transaction management is used, then system complexity is low, but time consumption and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation by automatically monitoring multiple account balances, evaluating trigger conditions, and executing transactions without manual intervention. The processing unit autonomously receives account information, determines whether trigger conditions are met, and performs transactions automatically, eliminating the need for manual account monitoring and transaction execution while significantly improving management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes continuous feedback loops where account information is regularly received and processed, trigger conditions are continuously evaluated based on current account states, and transactions are automatically adjusted based on changing conditions. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to real-time account changes and optimize transaction timing, improving productivity through dynamic responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If transactions are not optimized based on multiple accounts, then management simplicity is maintained, but costs and fees are maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecosts and feesVSAvoidautomatic transaction optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring trigger conditions and transaction parameters before actual transactions occur. Account holders预先 set up trigger conditions (such as balance thresholds, fee structures, or timing conditions) and the system automatically evaluates these pre-set conditions when account information is received, enabling optimized transaction decisions to be made in advance based on predicted beneficial outcomes rather than reactive manual decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7546945B1System and method for managing transactions
Publication Date: 2009.06.16 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US7546945B1 patent drawing
  • US7546945B1 patent drawing
  • US7546945B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for managing transactions associated with accounts of an individual are described. A method for managing transactions includes receiving information associated with the individual, information associated with a first account of the individual, and information associated with a second account of the individual. The received information associated with the individual and with the first and second accounts is processed, and a transaction based upon a result of the processing is automatically performed.