Multi-Agent Collaboration Control for Dynamic Agent Openness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-agent systems, particularly human-robot collaboration (HRC) systems, face challenges in modeling agent openness and adaptability, as traditional methods fail to account for dynamic agent entry and exit, leading to inefficiencies and inflexibility in real-world scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized Markov decision process (Dec-MDP) is adapted to include a collaboration variable and additional actions for agent activation and deactivation, forming an open Dec-MDP (oDec-MDP), which is trained using reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning to manage agent openness and optimize collaboration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional closed multi-agent systems are used, then system structure is simple and predictable, but agent adaptability and flexibility are reduced when agents need to dynamically join or leave tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagent opennessVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static agent participation structure into a dynamic one by introducing the collaboration variable that enables agents to transition between active and inactive states. This allows the system to adapt its composition based on task requirements while maintaining a manageable underlying structure through the formalized state transition mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the agent participation control into distinct components: the collaboration variable, activation actions, and deactivation actions. This segmentation allows independent management of agent entry and exit processes, making the overall system more adaptable without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If the world state is tracked to model agent openness, then complete system state information is available, but redundancy increases due to tracking attributes affected by inactive agents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate information completenessVSAvoidstate attributes
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential collaboration variable from the complete world state, separating the critical information needed for agent openness modeling from redundant attributes. This extraction maintains necessary state information while eliminating unnecessary data about inactive agents, reducing overall state complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If reinforcement learning and inverse reinforcement learning are used to train the oDec-MDP, then collaboration optimization is achieved, but training complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion efficiencyVSAvoidtraining process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using inverse reinforcement learning to first infer the reward function from expert demonstrations before applying reinforcement learning for policy optimization. This preliminary step provides a principled foundation that guides subsequent training, improving overall efficiency despite the added computational step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through both IRL (inferring reward from expert behavior) and RL (optimizing policy based on reward feedback). This dual feedback approach enables the system to learn optimal collaboration strategies while adapting to dynamic agent participation, achieving high productivity through iterative improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260023367A1System and Method for Open Multi-Agent Collaboration
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US20260023367A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023367A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023367A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosing a controller for controlling a collaboration of a set of agents jointly performing a task are provided. The set of agents includes different combinations of active agents and inactive agents defined by a collaboration variable. The controller is configured to accept a feedback signal including observations of a state of execution of the task performed by active agents, as specified in the collaboration variable. The observations are processed with a neural network trained with machine learning to determine actions for the active agents. The actions include one or more activation actions that cause activation or deactivation of a specific agent from the set of agents. The collaboration variable is updated when the neural network outputs at least one activation action to update a combination of active and inactive agents and cause the active agents to execute the determined actions.