Multi-Agent Query Routing with Dynamic Query Enhancement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conversational AI systems often provide suboptimal or inaccurate responses due to the complexity and variability of user queries exceeding the processing capabilities of a single language model, necessitating improved adaptability and scalability.

Innovation Solution

A multi-digital agent architecture with a dynamic query enhancement microservice and a multi-agent arbiter that processes unrefined query data through embeddings, historical user dialogue data, and rephrasing to enhance query data, selecting the appropriate digital agent for accurate response generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single language model is used for query processing, then the system structure remains simple, but the response accuracy deteriorates due to the complexity and variability of user queries exceeding processing capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the single language model into multiple specialized digital agents (e.g., search agent, synthesis agent, calculator agent, etc.), each capable of handling specific types of queries. The arbiter component divides incoming queries and routes them to appropriate agents, improving response accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The arbiter serves as a universal component that handles multiple functions: receiving queries, determining query types, selecting appropriate digital agents, and managing the coordination between different agents. This multi-functional design improves system efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple digital agents are deployed to handle complex queries, then response accuracy improves, but computational resource usage and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of deploying all digital agents for every query, the arbiter selectively activates only the necessary agents based on query type analysis. For example, simple factual queries may only require a search agent, while complex analytical queries may involve multiple agents. This partial action approach maintains high response accuracy while significantly reducing energy consumption and computational resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The arbiter acts as an intermediary that intelligently mediates between incoming queries and the pool of digital agents. It analyzes queries and determines the minimal set of agents needed to handle each query effectively, preventing unnecessary activation of agents and thereby reducing overall system energy consumption while maintaining response quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple digital agents are used to process queries, then system adaptability improves, but the complexity of agent selection and coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidagent selection mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arbiter uses parameter-based query analysis (such as query type, complexity, and topic categories) to dynamically select appropriate digital agents. By changing the selection parameters based on query characteristics, the system achieves high adaptability to different query types while keeping the selection mechanism itself relatively simple and rule-based rather than requiring complex decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260044499A1Multi-digital agent architecture with query-enhanced digital agent selection mechanism
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 POCKETNEST INC
  • US20260044499A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044499A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044499A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for query-enhanced digital agent selection within a multi-digital agent architecture is described. The system may include one or more processors, a graphical user interface module rendering an interactive agent querying interface for receiving unrefined query data, and a dynamic query enhancement microservice for transforming the unrefined query data to enhanced query data. The system may further include a multi-agent arbiter communicably interposed between the dynamic query enhancement microservice and a set of digital agents, the multi-agent arbiter for selecting a digital agent of the set to receive an agent selection control signal from the multi-agent arbiter and for forwarding the enhanced query data to the selected digital agent. The selected digital agent may generate a response to the unrefined query data based on a processing of the enhanced query data against data accessed within a computer data source to which the selected digital agent is specifically permissioned.