Multi-Agent RL Framework for Cooperative Policy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-agent systems, independent optimization by agents can lead to non-optimal results due to goal mismatches and lack of information sharing, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for the system as a whole.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement learning (RL) simulation framework is developed where each agent collects and shares information to calibrate rewards, allowing agents to cooperate and optimize their operations, with mechanisms for adjusting global information sharing to maximize overall benefits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If agents operate independently to maximize their own objectives, then each agent can achieve optimal local goals, but the system as a whole produces non-optimal results due to goal mismatches and lack of information sharing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent agent operationVSAvoidsystem-wide optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where agents receive information about the global state and other agents' actions. This feedback loop allows agents to adjust their local decisions based on system-wide consequences, resolving the contradiction between independent operation and system optimization by enabling agents to learn from collective outcomes while maintaining operational independence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a central coordinator or communication infrastructure as an intermediary that facilitates information exchange between independently operating agents. This mediator enables goal alignment and coordination without requiring agents to directly control each other, thus preserving operational independence while achieving system-wide optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If agents share all global information, then the system can achieve optimal coordination, but individual agents may become greedy and take advantage of global information to the detriment of other entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coordination efficiencyVSAvoidgreedy behavior exploiting global information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of information access to different agents based on their roles and needs. Instead of uniform global information sharing, agents receive customized information sets that are sufficient for their local optimization tasks but limited enough to prevent exploitative greedy behavior, thus achieving coordination efficiency while maintaining fairness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts information sharing parameters such as the amount, type, and frequency of global information provided to agents. By changing these parameters based on system state and agent behavior, the system can prevent greedy exploitation while maintaining adequate coordination, resolving the contradiction between coordination efficiency and prevention of harmful behaviors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If agents cooperate frequently to share and aggregate information, then the multi-agent system can be optimized, but the complexity of coordination and communication increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-agent system optimizationVSAvoidcoordination and communication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic information sharing and coordination among agents rather than continuous interaction. Agents exchange information and coordinate actions at regular intervals or triggered by specific events, which reduces communication overhead and coordination complexity while still achieving system optimization through periodic alignment of local and global goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240152774A1Periodically cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 X DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US20240152774A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152774A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152774A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for modeling agents in multi-agent systems as reinforcement learning (RL) agents and training control policies that cause the agents to cooperate towards a common goal. A method can include generating, for each of a group of simulated local agents in an agent network in which the simulated local agents share resources, information, or both, experience tuples having a state for the simulated local agent, an action taken by the simulated local agent, and a local result for the action taken, updating each local policy of each simulated local agent according to the respective local result, providing, to each of the simulated local agents, information representing a global state of the agent network, and updating each local policy of each simulated local agent according to the global state of the agent network.