Multi-Agent Navigation Using Traffic-Rule Nodes for Congestion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-agent navigation systems face challenges in achieving scalability, generality, and efficacy without a substantial increase in computational and deployment cost, with traditional methods like back-tracking search and localized collision-avoidance facing scalability and efficacy issues, and requiring effective communication capabilities that are demanding in terms of both computation and communication.

Innovation Solution

A multi-agent navigation system employing an environment-centric approach that segments a space into discrete regions governed by nodes trained on traffic rules, eliminating the need for runtime inter-agent communication, utilizing a learning-based method with neural networks for agent velocity modulation, and enabling decentralized coordination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional methods like back-tracking search or localized collision-avoidance are used, then generality is achieved, but scalability and efficacy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovegeneralityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation space is segmented into discrete regions, each governed by a node that has been trained on traffic rules. This segmentation allows the system to handle scalability by distributing navigation logic across multiple nodes rather than requiring centralized computation, while maintaining generality through the standardized node structure that can be applied across different environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes are pre-trained on traffic rules before runtime operation. This preliminary training action enables nodes to make immediate navigation decisions without requiring complex runtime communication or computation, thereby improving scalability and efficacy while maintaining the generality of the approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If effective communication capabilities are implemented for agent coordination, then navigation efficacy is improved, but computational and communication demands increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficacyVSAvoidcomputational and communication demand
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The environment-centric nodes serve as intermediaries between agents and the navigation space. Instead of agents communicating directly with each other (which would require complex inter-agent communication protocols), agents query the environment nodes for direction guidance. This intermediary approach maintains navigation efficacy while significantly reducing computational and communication demands on the agents themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The environment nodes autonomously determine preferred directions of travel based on pre-trained traffic rules without requiring agents to perform complex computations or communicate extensively. The system serves itself by having the environment intelligence rather than agent intelligence drive the navigation decisions, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If local navigation policies are used, then scalability is achieved, but generality deteriorates leading to congestion

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidgenerality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of navigation intelligence from agent-centric to environment-centric. By training nodes on traffic rules and having them govern discrete regions of the environment, the system achieves both scalability (through distributed nodes) and generality (through standardized traffic rule application across all nodes), preventing the congestion that results from purely local policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250355448A1Multi-Agent Navigation
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 TENCENT AMERICA LLC
  • US20250355448A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355448A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355448A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is a method of performing autonomous navigation by deploying one or more nodes over a predetermined space such that the one or more nodes is trained based on predetermined set of traffic rules; deploying one or more agents in the predetermined space; determining a destination for each of the one or more agents; determining a path to the destination; querying at least one of the nodes associated with at least one of corresponding regions encompass a current position of the corresponding one or more agents; determining, by at least one of the nodes, a direction of travel; sending the preferred direction of travel to the corresponding one or more agents; enabling the corresponding one or more agents to travel in the preferred direction; and determining the current position of the corresponding one or more agents is equal to the assigned destination or not.