Multi-Axial Vehicle Input Interface for Cursor-Free Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current input interface devices for vehicles are complex and costly to design and manufacture, requiring multiple versions to optimize user experience, which can be prohibitive, and do not effectively allow for intuitive multi-axial interaction while minimizing cursor-based navigation for drivers.

Innovation Solution

A modular input interface device with a housing capable of sensing movement in up to seven directions, combining rotary, push, and slide functions, allowing for customizable multi-axial interaction while keeping the display content fixed, even during rotational and other movements, to facilitate intuitive control of vehicle systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple versions of input interface are designed to optimize user experience for different environments, then user experience is improved, but design complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience optimizationVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The input interface is designed as a universal device that can perform multiple functions across different environments. The interface includes a display region and a input region that can detect various input types (touch, proximity, gesture) to adapt to different user needs without requiring separate specialized devices for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The input interface dynamically adjusts its behavior and sensitivity based on the detected input type and environmental context. The system can switch between touch mode, proximity mode, and gesture recognition mode, allowing it to optimize performance for different usage scenarios while maintaining a single unified hardware design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple versions of input interface are designed to optimize user experience for different environments, then user experience is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience optimizationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The input interface is designed as a universal device that can perform multiple functions across different environments. The interface includes a display region and a input region that can detect various input types (touch, proximity, gesture) to adapt to different user needs without requiring separate specialized devices for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple input functionalities (touch sensing, proximity detection, gesture recognition) are merged into a single integrated input interface device. This consolidation reduces the need for multiple separate components and versions, thereby lowering manufacturing costs while maintaining adaptability across different environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If cursor-based interaction is used to navigate menu structure, then interaction precision is improved, but driver operation safety deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction precisionVSAvoiddriver safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional cursor-based mechanical interaction with a rotary input mechanism that provides tactile feedback. This mechanical substitution allows drivers to interact with the interface using rotational motion and tactile cues, eliminating the need for visual attention required by cursor-based systems while maintaining precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotary input mechanism provides self-service through tactile feedback and intuitive rotational control, allowing drivers to operate the interface without visual confirmation. The physical rotation and tactile response enable precise input selection without requiring the driver to watch the display, thereby maintaining safety while achieving interaction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11726520B2Modular input interface device with multi-axial interaction
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • US11726520B2 patent drawing
  • US11726520B2 patent drawing
  • US11726520B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular input interface device having multi-axial functionality in a housing having an input interface that is capable of up to seven directions of movement. The modular interface device provides input to at least one processor associated with one or more vehicle systems.