Multi-Axis Energy Attenuating Vehicle Seat Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy attenuating seats lack effective multi-axis energy attenuation capabilities to manage complex shock loads involving both vertical and horizontal components, which can lead to inadequate protection for occupants during events like mine blasts or helicopter crashes.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates multi-axis energy attenuation mechanisms, including vertical and horizontal EA supports with compliant links that deform to absorb energy, allowing the seat to move in multiple directions while maintaining stability, and can be customized with various materials and shapes to accommodate different shock loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing energy attenuating seats are used, then simple vertical shock attenuation is provided, but multi-axis shock loads cannot be effectively managed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-axis shock attenuation capabilityVSAvoidoccupant protection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The energy attenuation system is divided into separate vertical and horizontal EA supports, each independently attenuating shock loads in their respective directions. This segmentation allows the system to handle multi-axis shock loads effectively while maintaining simple, replaceable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends energy attenuation from a single vertical dimension to multiple dimensions by adding horizontal EA supports. This dimensional expansion enables the seat to attenuate shock loads arriving from any direction, significantly improving adaptability and protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multi-axis energy attenuation mechanisms are added, then comprehensive shock load protection is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant protection effectivenessVSAvoidseat structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the energy attenuation function into separate vertical and horizontal supports with independent EA links, the system achieves multi-axis protection without creating a monolithic complex structure. Each segment remains relatively simple and can be independently analyzed, manufactured, and replaced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The EA links are designed with universal functionality to handle shock loads in their respective axes while maintaining similar structural characteristics and material properties. This universality simplifies the overall design and allows using the same type of compliant mechanism for different directional attenuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If EA links are designed to deform and absorb energy, then shock load attenuation is improved, but structural strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock energy absorptionVSAvoidsupport link strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The EA links are pre-designed with controlled deformation characteristics to absorb shock energy before it reaches the occupant. The compliant geometry and material selection ensure that the links deform in a predictable manner during impact, dissipating energy while maintaining adequate strength for normal use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the geometric parameters and material properties of the EA links to achieve the desired balance between energy absorption and structural strength. By adjusting parameters such as link thickness, length, and material composition, the system attains optimal shock attenuation performance while maintaining sufficient strength for operational loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides comprehensive protection by effectively absorbing both vertical and horizontal components of shock loads, ensuring occupant safety across a range of severe impact scenarios, including mine blasts and helicopter crashes, while allowing for easy replacement of components.

Implementation Method 1

compliant links that deform to absorb energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

EA supports with compliant links that deform to absorb energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation through deformation: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS8888161B1Vehicle seat with multi-axis energy attenuation
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 ARMORWORKS ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US8888161B1 patent drawing
  • US8888161B1 patent drawing
  • US8888161B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are provided for an energy attenuating seat assembly with multi-axis energy attenuation. In one embodiment the seat assembly comprises a seat with a back, a first energy attenuating support comprising a first seat guide, and a first energy attenuating link, the first energy attenuating support operatively disposed in a first direction with respect to the seat. The exemplary seat assembly further comprises a second energy attenuating support comprising a second seat guide, and a second energy attenuating link, the second energy attenuating support operatively disposed in a second direction with respect to the seat.