Multi-Axis Hand Controller for One-Handed Vehicle Motion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle drive control systems, including steering wheels and pedals, occupy space, increase vehicle weight, and require multiple limbs for operation, making them inefficient and inaccessible to individuals with physical disabilities.

Innovation Solution

A compact interface device integrating a drive controller and a steering controller, allowing for one-handed control through pivotable and rotatable movements, which can replace traditional systems by combining actuation of prime movers, brake assemblies, and steering systems via a 'by wire' arrangement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional drive control systems (steering wheels, pedals) are used, then reliable control functions are achieved, but vehicle space is occupied and weight is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol function reliabilityVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple control functions (accelerator, brake, steering) into a single integrated controller with multiple degrees of freedom. The controller integrates the drive controller and steering controller into one unified device that can perform all three functions through different movement axes, eliminating the need for separate traditional controls and reducing overall system weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated controller serves multiple functions simultaneously - it controls vehicle acceleration, braking, and steering through a single device. The controller can detect different movement directions and axes to activate different control functions, making one component perform the work of traditionally separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional drive control systems are used, then control functions are provided, but device complexity and space occupation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is segmented into multiple independent detection axes (first axis for drive control, second axis for steering, third axis for brake control). Each axis can independently detect movements and trigger corresponding control functions, allowing the system to maintain complexity only where necessary while simplifying the overall structure compared to traditional separate controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds spatial dimensions to control input - using movements along different axes (pitch, yaw, roll) of a single controller to differentiate between various control functions. This dimensional approach allows multiple functions to be controlled through a unified device without requiring separate physical controls for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If traditional control systems requiring multiple limbs are used, then adequate control is achieved, but accessibility for individuals with disabilities is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol operation easeVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated controller provides universal access to all vehicle control functions through a single operable device. Individuals with disabilities can control acceleration, braking, and steering using one hand or limited movement capabilities, as all functions are accessible through different movements of the same controller rather than requiring coordination of multiple separate controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system accepts various parameter changes in movement (different axes, directions, and magnitudes) to trigger appropriate control functions. This flexibility in parameter recognition allows the controller to adapt to different user capabilities and physical conditions, making the system more accessible to a broader range of users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12147261B2Motion control interface device
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 FCA US LLC
  • US12147261B2 patent drawing
  • US12147261B2 patent drawing
  • US12147261B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least some implementations, an interface device for control of multiple movements includes a drive controller and a steering controller. The drive controller is adapted to be movable about a pivot axis relative to a base. The steering controller carried by the drive controller for movement with the drive controller and rotatable relative to the drive controller about an axis of rotation that is not parallel to the pivot axis.