Multi-Axis Suspension Vessel for Rough Sea Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smaller vessels experience significant jostling due to water and wind conditions, making docking and beach landings difficult and dangerous, especially for those with mobility issues, and existing stabilization systems are ineffective in mitigating pitch, roll, and yaw movements in rough seas.

Innovation Solution

A multi-axis suspension system with four independent suspension systems operating between an inner deck hull and an outer hull, including vertical, horizontal, and angular systems, to stabilize passengers and cargo, with the outer hull designed to be lightweight and the majority of the vessel's mass concentrated on the inner deck, ensuring minimal movement and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a smaller vessel is used, then maneuverability and ease of operation are improved, but stability and comfort in rough seas deteriorate due to significant jostling from water and wind conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidstability in rough seas
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The vessel is divided into two separate hulls (outer hull and inner deck hull) that are independently suspended from each other through four independent suspension systems. This segmentation allows the outer hull to interact with water for maneuverability while the inner deck hull remains stabilized for comfort, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional suspension systems are used, then some stabilization is achieved, but they are ineffective in mitigating pitch, roll, and yaw movements in extremely rough weather

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilizationVSAvoideffectiveness in rough seas
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces multi-axis suspension capabilities by arranging four independent suspension systems at the corners of the inner deck hull, enabling stabilization in multiple dimensions (pitch, roll, and yaw) simultaneously. This multi-dimensional approach overcomes the limitations of traditional single-axis or two-axis suspension systems that fail in extreme conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Weight of moving object

If the outer hull is made lightweight, then responsiveness and maneuverability are improved, but structural strength and ability to withstand rough seas deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveouter hull weightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The vessel structure is segmented into an outer hull and an inner deck hull with independent suspension systems between them. This allows the outer hull to be optimized for lightweight construction and maneuverability, while the inner deck hull provides a stable platform for passengers and cargo, with the suspension systems transferring structural loads appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Stability of the object's composition

If mass is concentrated on the inner deck hull, then passenger stability and comfort are improved, but the vessel's response to water conditions and steering control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger stabilityVSAvoidsteering control
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The four independent suspension systems act as intermediaries between the outer hull (which responds to water conditions for steering) and the inner deck hull (which carries passengers and cargo). This intermediary mechanism allows the mass to be concentrated on the inner deck for stability while the outer hull maintains responsiveness to water conditions and steering control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The multi-axis suspension system effectively reduces multi-axial movements, enhancing passenger and cargo comfort, maintaining the outer hull in contact with water, and improving steering and control, even in rough seas, by distributing mass and using shock absorbers to absorb shocks in various planes.

Implementation Method 1

a first suspension system disposed vertically between the inner deck hull and the outer hull, a second suspension system disposed horizontally between the inner deck hull and the outer hull, a third suspension system disposed angularly vertically between the inner deck hull and the outer hull, and a fourth suspension system disposed angularly horizontally between the inner deck hull and the outer hull

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10543885B2Multi axis suspension vessel
Publication Date: 2020.01.28 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US10543885B2 patent drawing
  • US10543885B2 patent drawing
  • US10543885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vessel with three platforms—an outer hull, an inner deck hull and a passenger carriage, having four independent suspension systems there between so as to accommodate for the multi axis movements of the outer hull. This multi axis suspension system spread between the three platforms will offer the passenger carriage stability against the pitch, yaw and roll rotations a vessel makes as it twists and turns going up and down the slope of a wave as well as the heave, sway and surge movements induced by the waves pushing the vessel around and or the ship sliding down the face of a wave.