Multi-Battery Drive Control for Synchronized Energy Depletion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rail vehicle drive systems that rely on energy storage face inefficiencies due to uneven energy distribution across multiple energy storage subsystems, leading to reduced operational range and increased costs from oversized storage devices.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a drive system with multiple subsystems, where during periods of lower power output, specific subsystems are temporarily shut down to equalize energy content across all subsystems, ensuring they reach a minimum energy state simultaneously, thereby optimizing energy use and extending operational range without the need for large, expensive storage devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If multiple energy storage subsystems are used in parallel, then the operational range and energy capacity are increased, but the energy distribution becomes uneven and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational rangeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is divided into multiple independent drive subsystems, each with its own energy storage subsystem. This segmentation allows the system to achieve greater total energy capacity and operational range while managing complexity through modular architecture, where each subsystem can be controlled and monitored independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs preliminary assessment of the energy states of all subsystems before initiating partial shutdowns. By predicting which subsystems will reach minimum energy levels first and planning shutdown sequences in advance, the system prevents uneven energy distribution before it occurs, maintaining balance without continuous active intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Power

If all drive subsystems operate continuously, then maximum power output is maintained, but energy storage efficiency decreases due to uneven discharge rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidenergy storage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of shutting down entire drive subsystems completely, the system implements partial shutdowns where only certain drive subsystems are temporarily deactivated based on their current energy state. This partial action allows the system to maintain overall power output while reducing discharge rates of specific subsystems, thereby improving energy storage efficiency and preventing premature exhaustion of any single subsystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system periodically monitors the energy states of all subsystems and dynamically adjusts which subsystems are active or shut down. This periodic assessment and adjustment creates a rhythm of operation where subsystems are cycled in and out of service, ensuring that no single subsystem is over-discharged while maintaining the required power output levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Duration of action of moving object

If energy storage capacity is increased to extend operational range, then vehicle autonomy is improved, but system cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational rangeVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using one large energy storage subsystem, the system divides the total energy capacity into multiple smaller distributed subsystems. This segmentation achieves the same total operational range but with reduced weight per subsystem, allowing for more flexible mounting and potentially using lighter individual battery packs while maintaining the required total energy capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of energy

If partial shutdowns are implemented to balance energy levels, then energy storage efficiency is improved, but power output capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage efficiencyVSAvoidpower output
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial shutdowns rather than complete shutdowns of drive subsystems. This means that even when a subsystem is in shutdown mode, it may still provide limited power output or be quickly reactivated, ensuring that the overall power output capability is maintained while still achieving the energy balancing effect. The partial nature of the shutdown minimizes the impact on power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The shutdown configuration is dynamic rather than static. The control system continuously monitors energy levels and dynamically adjusts which subsystems are shut down and for how long, based on real-time conditions. This dynamic approach ensures that power output requirements are met while achieving energy balance, as the system can adapt the shutdown strategy to current power demands rather than applying fixed shutdown rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4242052A1Method for operating a drive system having a plurality of energy stores
Publication Date: 2023.09.13 SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH
  • EP4242052A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4242052A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4242052A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a drive system, in which the drive system comprises at least two drive subsystems, and each drive subsystem has an energy storage subsystem (BAT 1, BAT 2). At high power output (FULL) of the drive system, each of the at least two drive subsystems participates in the drive. During at least one period of lower power output (PART) of the drive system, at least one of the at least two drive subsystems is switched off, at least temporarily, so that the energy storage subsystems (BAT 1, BAT 2) of the at least two drive subsystems simultaneously reach a minimum energy content (E-min). The invention further relates, correspondingly, to a drive system, a device or a data processing system, a computer program, a computer-readable data carrier, and a data carrier signal.