Multi-Bay Container Transport for Space-Efficient Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inventory systems face inefficiencies in space utilization and throughput due to the inability to accommodate additional items once storage locations are filled, leading to increased costs and prolonged response times.

Innovation Solution

A container management system utilizing a robotic manipulator with a container transport that includes a receiving area and manipulators to move containers between locations, allowing for simultaneous loading and unloading of multiple containers, reducing cycle time and optimizing space usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If additional storage space is added to accommodate more containers, then storage capacity is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs mobile robotic manipulators that can dynamically reposition containers between storage locations and processing areas. This dynamic mobility allows the system to adapt to varying storage needs without adding permanent infrastructure, thereby increasing storage capacity while avoiding the complexity of expanding fixed storage facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic manipulators serve multiple functions: they can move containers for storage, retrieve containers for processing, and reposition containers to optimize space utilization. This multi-functionality allows a single system to handle various storage and retrieval operations, effectively increasing storage capacity without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If traditional sequential container handling is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but throughput and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous container handling operations by having robotic manipulators work in parallel - while one manipulator is moving a container to storage, another can be retrieving a container for processing. This eliminates idle time and maintains continuous productive action, thereby increasing throughput while reducing cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary positioning and preparation of containers before they are needed for processing. Robots can pre-position containers in optimal locations or prepare them for upcoming operations, reducing waiting time and enabling faster throughput without compromising system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If storage locations are filled to capacity, then space utilization is optimized, but the ability to accommodate additional items is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation flexibilityVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile robotic manipulators provide dynamic adaptability, allowing the system to reconfigure storage arrangements and access different areas as needed. When storage capacity is reached, robots can efficiently relocate containers to make space for new items, maintaining accommodation flexibility without requiring additional physical storage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs automated robotic manipulators that can independently manage container relocation and space optimization. When storage capacity is approached, the robots autonomously reposition containers to create space for additional items, providing self-service adaptability without human intervention or system expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Speed

If manual container handling is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but response time and efficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical container handling with automated robotic manipulators equipped with sensors and control systems. This substitution dramatically increases response time and handling speed, as robots can quickly locate, grasp, and move containers without human reaction time limitations, while the added complexity is managed through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic manipulators incorporate sensors and control systems that provide real-time feedback on container positions, grip forces, and movement status. This feedback enables rapid response and precise control, significantly improving response time and efficiency while managing system complexity through automated closed-loop control rather than manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12421043B1Method and system for moving containers
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12421043B1 patent drawing
  • US12421043B1 patent drawing
  • US12421043B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A container transport can move containers around a warehouse environment. The container transport can include a container receiving area with multiple container bays. Containers can be received in the container bays and moved around the warehouse environment.