Charged-particle Multi-beam Column with Aperture and Collimator Arrays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current charged-particle multi-beam tools face challenges in reducing complexity and improving throughput during semiconductor IC chip manufacturing, particularly in detecting and identifying micro and nano-scale defects on substrates, which affects yield and throughput.

Innovation Solution

A charged-particle multi-beam column design featuring a sub-beam defining aperture array, collimator array, objective lens array, and detector configuration that allows for the projection of multiple sub-beams onto a sample with focused corrections, enabling efficient defect detection and improved processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a traditional charged-particle multi-beam tool design is used, then the system can perform defect detection, but the device complexity and alignment correction requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidbeam path complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam path is segmented into distinct functional zones: a first region with a first magnetic field for initial beam formation and a second region with a second magnetic field for final beam projection. This segmentation allows each region to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A charge exchange gas is introduced as an intermediary medium in the beam path. The gas enables charge exchange between electrons and ions, allowing the beam charge state to be modified without complex electromagnetic lenses or deflectors, thereby simplifying the beam path while maintaining control over beam properties for precise defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex alignment and correction systems are implemented, then beam projection accuracy improves, but throughput and processing efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam projection accuracyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The charge exchange gas system provides self-aligning properties where the beam automatically adjusts to optimal charge states through interaction with the gas medium. This eliminates the need for complex active alignment systems and correction mechanisms, maintaining high beam projection accuracy while enabling continuous operation at high throughput without frequent recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple beam correction systems are added, then detection accuracy improves, but the inspection process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the charge state parameter of the beam through charge exchange with the introduced gas, rather than using multiple correction systems. This single parameter change (charge state) achieves the necessary beam control for accurate defect detection, eliminating time-consuming iterative correction processes and enabling faster inspection while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the detection and identification of defects, improving the yield and throughput of semiconductor IC chip manufacturing by simplifying the beam path and reducing the need for complex alignment and correction systems, thereby increasing the efficiency of the inspection process.

Implementation Method 1

a sub-beam defining aperture array configured to form sub-beams from a beam of charged particles emitted by a source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric aperture definition:

Implementation Method 2

a collimator array down-beam from the sub-beam defining aperture array, each collimator being configured to collimate a sub-beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCollimation:

Implementation Method 3

an objective lens array, each objective lens being configured to project a collimated sub-beam onto a sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic lensing: Electrostatic Lens

Implementation Method 4

a detector configured to detect charged particles emitted from the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle detection:

Implementation Method 5

The interactions between the material structure at the probing spot and the landing electrons from the beam of electrons cause electrons to be emitted from the surface, such as secondary electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron impact emission: Electron Impact Desorption

Data Source

PatentUS20230238215A1Charged-particle multi-beam column, charged-particle multi-beam column array, inspection method
Publication Date: 2023.07.27 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20230238215A1 patent drawing
  • US20230238215A1 patent drawing
  • US20230238215A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to charged-particle multi-beam columns and multi-beam column arrays. In one arrangement, a sub-beam defining aperture array forms sub-beams from a beam of charged particles. A collimator array collimates the sub-beams An objective lens array projects the collimated sub-beams onto a sample. A detector detects charged particles emitted from the sample. Each collimator is directly adjacent to one of the objective lenses. The detector is provided in a plane down-beam from the sub-beam defining aperture array.