Multi-Boiler Control for Heat Demand and Ignition Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing water heating systems face inefficiencies and inadequate demand satisfaction when multiple boilers are not effectively managed and interfaced, leading to potential ignition blowout issues and delayed responses to operational changes or faults.

Innovation Solution

A control system that coordinates the operation of multiple boiler units within a common housing, allowing for modulation of output, reduced blower speed to prevent ignition blowout, and an interface for monitoring and altering operating parameters, ensuring efficient operation and communication between units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple boiler units are operated independently without coordination, then each unit can operate autonomously, but the system fails to efficiently satisfy heat demand and may cause ignition blowout

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidheat demand satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple boiler units into a coordinated system where a master controller integrates the operation of slave controllers. The master controller receives heat demand signals and coordinates the firing sequence of multiple boilers, ensuring they work together as a unified system to satisfy total heat demand while preventing ignition blowout through controlled sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The master controller performs preliminary actions by pre-coordinating the firing sequence before ignition attempts. It controls the timing and sequence of slave boiler ignitions, ensuring that boilers are fired in a predetermined sequence that prevents blowout while maximizing heat output capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If a single boiler operates at maximum capacity, then it can meet high heat demand, but it cannot modulate output continuously to match varying demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat output capacityVSAvoidoutput modulation range
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the total heat output requirement across multiple boiler units. Instead of relying on a single boiler to provide the full range of output modulation, the system divides the load among several boilers, each operating within their optimal modulation range, thereby achieving both high capacity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the operation of multiple boilers based on varying heat demand. The master controller continuously monitors demand and dynamically switches between different boiler combinations, modulating the overall system output by controlling which boilers are active and at what intensity, providing continuous adaptability across a wide range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If multiple boilers are coordinated to meet high heat demand, then system capacity increases, but control complexity and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal heat outputVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The master controller serves multiple functions: it acts as the primary heat demand sensor, the central coordinator for all slave boilers, and the communication hub. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby managing complexity while handling multiple boilers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The master controller acts as an intermediary between the heat demand signal and the multiple slave boilers. It receives the heat demand input and translates it into coordinated control signals for each slave unit, simplifying the control architecture by centralizing the decision-making logic rather than requiring complex peer-to-peer communication between all boilers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If boilers operate without centralized monitoring, then system simplicity is maintained, but response to faults and operational adjustments is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidfault response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The master controller continuously receives feedback signals from slave boilers regarding their operational status, temperature, and performance. This real-time feedback enables the system to detect faults immediately and respond by adjusting the operation of other boilers or alerting operators, maintaining simplicity while enabling rapid fault response through automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8651064B2Control system for a boiler assembly
Publication Date: 2014.02.18 LOCHINVAR LLC
  • US8651064B2 patent drawing
  • US8651064B2 patent drawing
  • US8651064B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for managing and interfacing a plurality of water heaters, e.g. boilers. The control system includes a first boiler unit controlled by a first boiler control unit and a second boiler unit controlled by a second boiler control unit. The first boiler control unit is operable to coordinate the operation of the first and second boiler units in response to changes in output demand. The flues of the first and second boiler units are connected to a common flue. The control system further includes an interface and an interface control system. The interface control system communicates requests from the interface, to report and/or alter the operating parameters of the first and second boiler units, to the first and second boiler control units and communicates the request outcome(s) back to the interface.