Multi-Camera Image Backbones for Accuracy-Speed Tradeoffs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face computational challenges in processing vast amounts of sensor data from multiple cameras, leading to inefficiencies in resource usage and potential blind spots due to the need to maintain high accuracy and precision across all camera views.

Innovation Solution

Implementing two backbone models: a high precision but slower model for high accuracy and a high speed but less accurate model, dynamically selecting which model to use based on vehicle behavior and camera importance, combining outputs for unified representation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high precision imaging backbone is used for all cameras, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the imaging backbone into two distinct models: a high precision imaging backbone for accurate feature detection and a high speed imaging backbone for efficient processing. This segmentation allows the system to allocate different processing capabilities to different cameras based on their importance and the current driving scenario, rather than uniformly applying high precision processing to all cameras.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different precision levels to different cameras based on their importance. Critical cameras (e.g., front-facing cameras for collision detection) use the high precision imaging backbone, while less critical cameras use the high speed imaging backbone. This ensures that computational resources are concentrated where they are most needed for safety-critical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If high precision imaging backbone is used for all cameras, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging backbone is segmented into high precision and high speed models, allowing parallel processing where critical cameras are processed with high precision while non-critical cameras are processed with high speed models, maintaining overall system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different precision levels are applied locally to different cameras based on their importance. This ensures that processing speed is optimized for the overall system while maintaining high accuracy where it matters most for safety-critical detection tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If computational resources are reduced, then use of energy decreases, but reliability worsens due to potential blind spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource consumptionVSAvoidcomprehensive surroundings imaging
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures reliability by assigning high precision processing to critical cameras that cover essential viewing angles for safety. This localized high precision processing maintains comprehensive surroundings imaging capability while reducing overall computational resource consumption for less critical cameras.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which imaging backbone to use for each camera based on the current driving scenario and camera importance. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain reliability in critical situations while optimizing energy consumption during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12579802B1Variable compute image backbones
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12579802B1 patent drawing
  • US12579802B1 patent drawing
  • US12579802B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for a multi-camera object detector having two or more backbone models. In particular, systems and methods are provided for including two or more backbone machine learning models, with one backbone optimized for speed and the other backbone optimized for precision. In particular, the first backbone can be highly accurate but slower than the second backbone and with a higher computer resource usage. The second backbone can be fast and efficient but have lower accuracy for object detection. In some examples, the second backbone can use fewer images and/or lower resolution images. The determination of which backbone to use can be based on fixed rules, or it can be determined based on another machine learning component. The outputs from the first and second backbones for each camera can be combined together into a unified representation, such as a bird's eye view (BEV) space.