Multi-Camera QA Architecture for Object-Level Inspection Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advanced quality assurance techniques for configuring and implementing image analysis inspection tools on production lines face challenges in high-throughput environments, where frequent changeovers and increased manufacturing demands complicate the procurement, setup, and monitoring of automated camera-based quality inspection systems.

Innovation Solution

A multi-camera architecture that leverages computer vision and machine learning to analyze images from multiple inspection camera modules, correlating results on an object-by-object basis using timestamps, unique identifiers, and synchronization methods, allowing for remote storage and visualization of inspection results to simplify the implementation and monitoring of quality assurance systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple inspection camera modules are deployed to inspect objects on production lines, then inspection coverage and quality assurance capability are improved, but hardware complexity and system configuration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assurance capabilityVSAvoidhardware configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple inspection camera modules into a unified multi-camera system that shares common infrastructure components including synchronized timestamp generation, centralized data correlation logic, and integrated machine learning model execution. This merging approach maintains comprehensive inspection coverage while reducing redundant hardware complexity and simplifying system configuration through shared resources across all camera modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If multiple inspection camera modules capture images simultaneously, then inspection speed and throughput are improved, but data correlation and synchronization complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoiddata correlation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary synchronization by assigning synchronized timestamps to images captured by multiple camera modules at the moment of capture. This preliminary timing action enables subsequent data correlation operations to efficiently match images from different cameras to the same physical object without requiring complex real-time synchronization during the correlation process, thereby maintaining high throughput while simplifying data processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used for image analysis inspection, then inspection accuracy and defect detection capability are improved, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the machine learning analysis process by executing different machine learning models on different camera modules in parallel, with each model specialized for detecting specific defect types or inspecting particular regions of interest. This segmentation enables simultaneous processing of multiple image streams without sequential bottlenecks, maintaining high detection accuracy while reducing overall processing time through concurrent execution of specialized analysis tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If synchronized timestamps are assigned to images from multiple cameras, then object correlation accuracy is improved, but clock synchronization complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject correlation accuracyVSAvoidclock synchronization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a centralized timestamp server as an intermediary that provides synchronized time references to all camera modules. This intermediary component generates and distributes synchronized timestamps to multiple cameras, enabling accurate temporal correlation of images from different sources without requiring complex peer-to-peer synchronization protocols between cameras themselves, thereby maintaining correlation accuracy while simplifying the synchronization architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12050454B2Cloud-based multi-camera quality assurance lifecycle architecture
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 ELEMENTARY ROBOTICS INC
  • US12050454B2 patent drawing
  • US12050454B2 patent drawing
  • US12050454B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Data is received that includes a feed of images of a plurality of objects passing in front of each of a plurality of inspection camera modules forming part of each of a plurality of stations. The stations can together form part of a quality assurance inspection system. The objects when combined or assembled, can form a product. The received data derived from each inspection camera module can be separately analyzed using at least one image analysis inspection tool. The analyzing can include visually detecting a unique identifier for each object. The images are transmitted with results from the inspection camera modules along with the unique identifiers to a cloud-based server to correlate results from the analyzing for each inspection camera module on an product-by-product basis. Access to the correlated results can be provided to a consuming application or process via the cloud-based server.