Multi-Camera Inspection System Software Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advanced quality assurance techniques for camera-based inspection systems face challenges in simplifying hardware configurations and providing easy setup and monitoring in high-speed automation environments, where frequent changeovers and increased manufacturing demands complicate the implementation of automated quality inspection systems.

Innovation Solution

A video processing pipeline that utilizes containerized image analysis tools, including computer vision and machine learning algorithms, to generate quality assurance metrics and overlay images, which are then combined with object images to provide enhanced visuals for analysis, allowing for software-based configuration and visualization of inspection results, including anomaly detection and explainability of algorithm decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple hardware components (triggers, lenses) are used for camera-based inspection, then inspection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical hardware components (triggers, lens changes) with software-based solutions. The system uses software-controlled camera modules that can dynamically adjust inspection parameters, generate synthetic triggers through image processing, and change optical characteristics via software-controlled mechanisms, thereby reducing physical hardware complexity while maintaining inspection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal camera module design that can perform multiple inspection functions through software configuration rather than requiring separate hardware for each function. The system can dynamically adapt the same physical camera module to different inspection tasks by changing software parameters, making the system multi-functional without increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If hardware configuration is simplified, then ease of setup is improved, but inspection flexibility may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of setupVSAvoidinspection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic software-based configuration that allows the inspection system to adapt to different inspection requirements without physical reconfiguration. The system can dynamically adjust inspection parameters, switch between different inspection modes, and modify camera module behavior through software, providing flexibility equivalent to hardware reconfiguration but with much easier setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the software domain to achieve inspection flexibility. By modifying software-controlled parameters such as exposure settings, region of interest, inspection criteria, and processing algorithms, the system can adapt to different inspection scenarios without changing physical hardware configuration, thus maintaining flexibility while simplifying setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If more image analysis tools are added, then quality assurance capability is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assurance capabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image analysis functionality into multiple specialized containerized tools, each performing a specific quality assurance function. These modular tools (e.g., defect detection, dimension measurement, surface inspection) can be independently developed, tested, and maintained, reducing overall processing complexity while providing comprehensive quality assurance capability through their coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a video processing pipeline as an intermediary layer that coordinates multiple containerized image analysis tools. This pipeline manages data flow between tools, standardizes interfaces, and orchestrates the complex processing sequence, thereby enabling sophisticated quality assurance analysis while keeping the system architecture manageable and complexity controlled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11937019B2Intelligent quality assurance and inspection device having multiple camera modules
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 ELEMENTARY ROBOTICS INC
  • US11937019B2 patent drawing
  • US11937019B2 patent drawing
  • US11937019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Each of a plurality of co-located inspection camera modules captures raw images of objects passing in front of the co-located inspection camera modules which form part of a quality assurance inspection system. The inspection camera modules have either a different image sensor or lens focal properties and generate different feeds of raw images. The co-located inspection camera modules can be selectively switched amongst to activate the corresponding feed of raw images. The activated feed of raw images is provided to a consuming application or process for quality assurance analysis.