Multi-Channel Attribution Using Time and Effectiveness Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the effectiveness of advertisements across multiple channels are challenging due to difficulties in attributing the influence of one channel's advertisement over another when a user interacts with both, as conventional multi-touch attribution methods rely on time between touch events and channel effectiveness without accurately accounting for both factors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for attributing responses to multiple channels by determining conversion data for each channel based on user interactions, using both the effectiveness and time to convert, allowing for a holistic attribution methodology that considers the impact of multiple channels such as social media, television, and websites.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional multi-touch attribution methods use only time between touch events to determine channel weights, then the attribution process is simplified, but the measurement precision of channel effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribution process complexityVSAvoidchannel effectiveness measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple attribution factors (time between touch events and channel effectiveness metrics) into a unified attribution model. This merging allows the system to simultaneously consider both temporal sequences and channel performance data, resolving the contradiction by integrating rather than choosing between simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces additional parameters (channel effectiveness metrics) to the traditional time-based attribution model. By changing the parameter set from solely temporal measurements to include performance metrics, the system achieves more precise measurement without completely complicating the process, as the new parameters are systematically integrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If conventional multi-touch attribution methods use only channel effectiveness to determine channel weights, then the attribution accounts for channel quality, but the loss of time information reduces measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel effectiveness measurementVSAvoidtime between touch events
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges time-based attribution with effectiveness-based attribution by calculating channel weights that incorporate both the temporal sequence of touch events and the effectiveness metrics of each channel. This combination ensures that neither time information nor effectiveness data is lost, but both contribute to the final attribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If the system attributes conversion credits based on both effectiveness and time, then the attribution accuracy is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribution accuracyVSAvoidattribution system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the attribution process into distinct computational steps: calculating time-based weights, calculating effectiveness-based weights, and combining these weights to determine final channel attribution. This segmentation manages complexity by breaking down the complex attribution task into manageable, systematic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11972454B1Attribution of response to multiple channels
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 POSHMARK INC
  • US11972454B1 patent drawing
  • US11972454B1 patent drawing
  • US11972454B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various implementations for multitouch attribution are described. One example method includes receiving a plurality of channel data associated with a first channel and second channel, determining conversion data for the first channel and the second channel using the plurality of channel data, receiving a first touch event and a second touch event associated with a first channel and a second channel, determining a first attribution for the first channel using a first touch event and the first channel data, determining a second attribution for the second channel using a second touch event and the second channel data, and determine an item conversion strategy using the first attribution and the second attribution.