Multi-compartment Insect Trap with Segmented Entryways

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional insect traps are ineffective for capturing multiple species of insects due to territorial behavior and close-proximity repulsion between species, requiring multiple traps to be set out, which is inconvenient, costly, and unsightly.

Innovation Solution

A multi-species insect trap with separate compartments and spaced-apart entry structures, each containing a specific attractant plume that attracts different insect species, allowing for the simultaneous trapping of multiple species without antagonistic interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple traps are used to attract and entrap multiple insect species, then trapping effectiveness for multiple species is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping effectiveness for multiple speciesVSAvoidnumber of traps required
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trap is divided into multiple separate compartments (first compartment, second compartment, etc.) within a single trap structure. Each compartment has its own entry structure and attractant, allowing different insect species to be trapped simultaneously in separate sections without interference. This segmentation enables one trap to function as multiple single-species traps would otherwise be needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The single trap structure serves multiple functions by accommodating multiple compartments, each capable of trapping different insect species. The trap becomes a universal device that can simultaneously attract and entrap various species (e.g., wasps, hornets, yellow jackets) through different attractants in different compartments, eliminating the need for multiple separate traps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple traps are deployed to target different insect species, then trapping versatility is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping versatilityVSAvoidconvenience of trap management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple trap functions are merged into a single trap unit. Instead of managing multiple separate traps for different species, the invention combines multiple compartments with different attractants into one integrated trap structure. This merging simplifies operation by reducing the number of individual traps to manage, clean, and replenish, while maintaining the ability to target multiple species simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple traps are set out to attract different insect species, then trapping effectiveness is improved, but aesthetic appearance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping effectivenessVSAvoidvisual appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple trap functions are merged into a single aesthetically pleasing unit. Instead of having multiple separate traps visible in the environment, the invention consolidates them into one integrated trap structure with multiple compartments. This merging improves aesthetic appearance by reducing the number of visible trap objects, while the internal compartment structure maintains the ability to effectively trap multiple species.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The trap effectively captures multiple insect species by using separate attractant plumes that minimize repulsion, reducing the need for multiple traps and enhancing trapping efficiency while being aesthetically more acceptable.

Implementation Method 1

the attractant is a volatile attractant formed into a solid with a polyurethane matrix, such that the attractant will evaporate and escape from the matrix over a period of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

the volatile olfactory attractant mixes with vapors from a chemical attractant and/or water in a separate container, the mixed vapors exiting the trap in a plume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS8051600B2Flying insect trap with spaced entryways
Publication Date: 2011.11.08 STERLING INT INC
  • US8051600B2 patent drawing
  • US8051600B2 patent drawing
  • US8051600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An insect trap (100) with spaced apart first and second entry structures (120, 140), includes an entrapment chamber (100) having a first compartment (102) and a second compartment (104) separated from the first compartment with a transverse panel (106). A conical first tapered guide (126) extends from the first entry structure into the first compartment, and a second tapered guide (146) extends from the second entry structure to the second compartment. The guides encourage the target insects to venture further into the trap, while hindering egress from the trap. One or more of the compartments include means for retaining an attractant. Traps having more than two compartments with spaced apart entryways are also disclosed.