Multi-Component Symbol Evaluation for Gaming System Award Variety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to provide new and exciting manners of evaluating symbols in electronic gaming machines (EGMs) to increase player enjoyment, entertainment, and excitement, as existing methods may become repetitive and fail to offer sufficient variety in determining awards.

Innovation Solution

A gaming system and method that utilizes multi-component symbols to determine modifiers and base counts, which are then used to calculate awards, allowing for multiple ways to evaluate symbol combinations and provide varied award structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional payline-based symbol evaluation methods are used, then the gaming system is simple to operate, but the player engagement and award variety are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaward varietyVSAvoidevaluation method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the symbol evaluation process into multiple independent evaluation pathways: payline evaluation, symbol position evaluation, and multi-component symbol evaluation. Each pathway operates independently and can be activated based on player preferences, providing diverse award structures without requiring complete redesign of the entire gaming system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gaming system integrates multiple evaluation methods within a single unified platform, allowing the same symbol set to be evaluated through different mechanisms (payline-based, position-based, component-based). This multi-functionality enables the system to provide varied award structures while maintaining a single cohesive gaming environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple evaluation methods are implemented to increase award variety, then player engagement improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation method varietyVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically activates different evaluation methods based on game state and player preferences. The evaluation pathways can be enabled or disabled independently, allowing the system to adapt its complexity level to match player engagement needs while maintaining operational simplicity through automated selection of appropriate evaluation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The gaming system automatically manages the complexity of multiple evaluation methods without requiring player intervention. The system self-determines which evaluation pathways to activate based on symbol combinations and game rules, shielding players from system complexity while delivering varied award structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multi-component symbols are used to determine modifiers and base counts, then award determination variety increases, but the measurement and evaluation process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaward determination varietyVSAvoidsymbol evaluation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent breaks down multi-component symbol evaluation into discrete, manageable steps: identifying individual components, counting their occurrences, determining base counts, and applying modifiers. This segmentation makes the complex measurement process systematic and reproducible, improving precision through structured evaluation rather than vague assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses defined parameters (base count, modifier values, multiplier factors) to standardize the evaluation of multi-component symbols. By transforming complex symbol combinations into numerical parameters that can be systematically processed, the system improves measurement precision while maintaining award determination variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9208640B2Gaming system and method providing multiway evaluation for a game associated with multi-component symbols configured to affect a base count and/or a value of one or more modifiers
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US9208640B2 patent drawing
  • US9208640B2 patent drawing
  • US9208640B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a gaming system and method providing multiway evaluation for a game including multi-component symbols that are utilized to determine one or more modifiers. In one embodiment, the gaming system is configured to operate a game associated with a plurality of reels including a plurality of individual symbols and a plurality of multi-component symbols including a plurality of the individual symbols. The gaming system displays a plurality of the symbols on the reels and determines a quantity of adjacent reels that each displays at least one instance of a first individual symbol. The gaming system determines a modifier for each of the adjacent reels based on a quantity of instances of the first individual symbol displayed by that reel, and determines any awards for the first individual symbol based on the determined quantity of adjacent reels and any determined modifiers.