Dust and gas separator and vacuum cleaner

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dust-air separation devices in vacuum cleaners suffer from inefficient dust-air separation due to non-turbulent airflow, leading to excessive kinetic energy loss and filter clogging, resulting in reduced suction power and performance.

Innovation Solution

A dust-air separation device with a cyclone separation chamber featuring an air deflector and two separators, which divides airflow into two parts, reducing vortex flow, increasing airflow patency, and enhancing dust-air separation efficiency, while minimizing kinetic energy loss and filter clogging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-cone cyclone separation device is used, then the structure is simple, but the airflow is not turbulent resulting in excessive loss of airflow kinetic energy and inefficient dust-air separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoiddust-air separation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separation chamber is divided into multiple cones (first cone, second cone, third cone) arranged in sequence, with each cone performing dust-air separation independently. This segmentation allows each cone to optimize airflow patterns and maintain turbulent flow, improving overall separation efficiency while keeping individual cone structures relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-cone structure to a multi-cone arrangement in the axial direction, adding a dimensional element to the separation process. The sequential arrangement of cones along the airflow path creates multiple stages of separation, enhancing efficiency without significantly increasing lateral complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a single-cone cyclone separation device is used, then the device complexity is low, but kinetic energy loss is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechamber structure complexityVSAvoidairflow kinetic energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the separation process into multiple cones, each cone can be optimized to maintain higher airflow velocities and reduce energy loss. The segmented structure allows better control of airflow patterns, reducing turbulence-induced energy dissipation while maintaining separation effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-cone structure ensures continuous turbulent airflow and dust-air separation throughout the chamber. The sequential arrangement maintains airflow momentum and kinetic energy across multiple separation stages, preventing energy loss that would occur in a single-stage design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Power

If existing dust-air separation devices are used, then the initial suction power is adequate, but filter clogging occurs easily causing sharp drop in suction power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuction powerVSAvoidperformance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple cones create multiple separation stages that progressively remove dust particles of different sizes. This multi-stage approach prevents dust accumulation that would clog filters, maintaining consistent suction power and reliable performance over extended operation periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-cone structure performs preliminary dust removal in stages before air reaches the filter. By pre-separating dust particles across multiple cones, the system prevents filter clogging before it occurs, ensuring stable suction power and reliable operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves airflow smoothness and dust-air separation efficiency, preventing filter clogging and sudden suction power drops, leading to better vacuuming performance by reducing mutual airflow impact and increasing the exhaust area of the cyclone separation chamber.

Implementation Method 1

a cyclone separation chamber, in which are disposed a first separator and a second separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

The airflow is not turbulent, resulting in excessive loss of airflow kinetic energy and inefficient dust-air separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS20240099530A1Dust and gas separator and vacuum cleaner
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 SHENZHEN CHENBEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20240099530A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099530A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099530A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dust-air separation device and vacuum cleaner comprises a housing with an air inlet channel, a cyclone separation chamber, and a dust collection chamber, the air inlet channel and the dust collection chamber are connected to the cyclone separation chamber, and an air outlet is formed on the housing; the inner peripheral wall of the cyclone separation chamber is provided with an air deflector extending along the flow direction of the airflow in the cyclone separation chamber. A first separator and the second separator are respectively located on opposite sides of the air deflector along the axial direction of the cyclone separation chamber, and the first separator and the second separator are both connected to the air outlet. The dust-air separation device reduces filter clogging and sudden drops in suction power such that the device has better vacuuming performance.