Multi-Container Packing Monitoring With Real-Time Error Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Storage facilities face issues with multi-container packing errors, leading to missing, wrong, or additional items in shipments, resulting in unnecessary costs due to lost item claims, returns, and restocking.

Innovation Solution

A container packing monitoring system that utilizes sensors and machine learning models to capture and process image data, providing real-time alerts and corrective actions to ensure items are placed correctly in containers, and includes displays for feedback to packing agents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual packing operations are used to fill containers, then operational flexibility and ease of operation are maintained, but packing errors increase leading to missing, wrong, or additional items in shipments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously captures images of items being packed, compares them against the packing list, and provides real-time feedback to the packing agent through displays. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables manual operators to maintain high accuracy without automation, resolving the contradiction between reliability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection and verification with an automated image recognition system using cameras and machine learning models. This substitution of mechanical/visual processes with optical and computational systems improves packing accuracy while keeping the physical packing operation manual, thus improving reliability without significantly increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If automated image recognition systems are deployed to monitor packing, then packing precision improves, but device complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem placement accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is divided into modular components: image capture devices positioned at specific locations, separate processing units running machine learning models, and display systems providing targeted feedback. This segmentation allows the complex functionality to be distributed and managed in manageable modules, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses machine learning models that automatically learn and improve at identifying items and detecting packing errors without manual programming or intervention. The system self-calibrates and adapts to different packing scenarios, reducing the need for complex configuration and maintenance, thus improving precision while keeping operational complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If real-time monitoring and alerts are implemented, then packing errors are reduced, but loss of time due to system processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror reductionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs image capture and analysis continuously during the packing process itself, rather than inspecting after packing is complete. Errors are detected and corrected in real-time during the natural flow of work, eliminating the need for separate inspection steps and avoiding time loss while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system operates continuously throughout the packing process without interrupting or slowing down the packing agent. Multiple cameras capture images at different stages, and processing occurs in parallel, ensuring that the useful action of packing continues uninterrupted while monitoring provides continuous error detection and correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12545467B2System and methods for reducing multi-container packing errors
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 KOIREADER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12545467B2 patent drawing
  • US12545467B2 patent drawing
  • US12545467B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and devices for automating and computerizing audits, tracking, and error prevention associated with container packing events and, in particular, multi-container packing events at a storage facility, yard, warehouse, or the like. In some cases, the systems and devices may be configured to monitor and detect errors or issues with packing items and send alerts and control signals to agents, such as autonomous agents, to correct the detected errors.