Multi-Core Catalytic Heat Exchanger for Fuel Tank Inerting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fuel tank inerting systems face challenges due to varying cooling requirements across different flight stages, as existing catalytic heat exchangers are either too large for ground conditions or too small for cruise conditions, leading to inefficient operation and maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A multi-core catalytic heat exchanger with a control valve that directs fuel and oxygen flow to specific cores based on cooling demand, allowing for adaptive capacity adjustment to match varying operating conditions, ensuring optimal catalyst reaction temperatures and reducing fuel consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the heat exchanger is sized to achieve a maximum temperature of 425 °F (220 °C) on the ground, then ground operating conditions are satisfied, but the heat exchanger produces warmed ram air of 1600 °F (870 °C) during cruise, far in excess of necessary temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst reaction temperatureVSAvoidheat exchanger performance across flight stages
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is divided into multiple independent flow paths (first flow path for cooling medium, second flow path for fuel vapor and oxygen, third flow path for product gas). Each flow path can be independently controlled through valve assemblies, allowing the system to segment the catalytic reaction into manageable units that can be activated or deactivated based on operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic control through valve assemblies that can adjust the flow rates of cooling medium, fuel vapor, oxygen, and product gas in real-time. This allows the heat exchanger to adapt its thermal characteristics dynamically, transitioning between ground and cruise operating modes by modulating flow rates rather than relying on a fixed design point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the heat exchanger is made small to avoid high cruise temperatures, then cruise operating conditions are improved, but ground temperatures become too high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchanger capacity for cruise conditionsVSAvoidground operating temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is designed as a multi-functional device that can operate effectively across diverse flight stages. By incorporating multiple flow paths with independent valve control, a single heat exchanger unit serves both ground and cruise operations, eliminating the need for separate heat exchangers optimized for each condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters (flow rates of cooling medium, fuel vapor, and oxygen) to adapt to different thermal demands. During ground operations, higher cooling medium flow rates are used to manage higher thermal loads, while during cruise, lower flow rates prevent overheating. This parameter adjustment allows the same physical heat exchanger to meet varying thermal requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single-sized heat exchanger is used for all flight stages, then device complexity is reduced, but operating efficiency decreases due to non-optimal performance under varying conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchanger configurationVSAvoidinert gas generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is segmented into multiple flow paths with independent valve control, allowing selective activation of catalytic reaction zones. This segmentation enables the system to optimize inert gas generation efficiency by activating only the necessary number of flow paths based on demand, rather than operating a single flow path at non-optimal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If the catalytic reaction is maintained at minimum 350 °F (180 °C) to keep the catalyst active, then catalyst reactivity is improved, but cooling requirements increase during ground operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidcooling energy demand
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger utilizes the exothermic heat generated by the catalytic reaction itself to provide the necessary heating. The reaction products and incoming streams exchange heat within the heat exchanger, allowing the system to self-maintain the minimum 350 °F (180 °C) catalyst temperature without requiring external heating energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides precise control over catalytic reaction rates and cooling, optimizing performance across different flight stages by selectively activating cores with varying cooling capacities, thus maintaining efficient inert gas generation and reducing fuel consumption.

Implementation Method 1

a catalyst-based fuel tank inerting system, where bleed-air-fed air separation modules and filter elements are replaced by a catalyst. Such a system requires fuel vapour to be mixed with oxygen and passed through a catalyst device to be converted into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Due to significant temperatures that are generated during the catalyst's exothermic reaction the catalyst needs to be cooled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 3

The heat exchanger may be cooled by e.g. ram air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

Hence the catalyst may be provided as a coating inside a heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchanger: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentEP3428568B1Heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2023.03.22 HS MARSTON AEROSPACE
  • EP3428568B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

There is provided a fuel tank inerting system for an aircraft. The system comprises: a catalytic heat exchanger 100 comprising a first flow path and a second flow path for heat exchange with the first flow path, wherein the first flow path comprises a plurality of core flow paths 132, 134 each fluidly isolated from one another within the catalytic heat exchanger and each arranged to exchange heat with the second flow path; and a control valve 150 arranged upstream of the first flow path of the catalytic heat exchanger and arranged to selectively control a flow to each of the core flow paths.