Multi-Critic Policy Learning for Safe Robotic Skill Discovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots with high degrees of freedom operating in continuous state spaces face challenges in efficiently exploring manipulation strategies, planning trajectories, and ensuring safety in shared workspaces, which complicates their integration into real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

A multi-critic architecture is employed to learn a policy using multiple critics with respective objective functions that balance accuracy, exploration, and safety, minimizing interference between reward functions and enabling stable policy learning for robotic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple reward functions are used to guide skill discovery, then the robot can explore diverse manipulation strategies, but interference between reward functions destabilizes policy learning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill discovery diversityVSAvoidpolicy learning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single policy learning process into multiple independent critic networks, each responsible for evaluating one specific reward function. This segmentation allows each critic to provide specialized feedback without interference from other reward functions, resolving the contradiction between exploring diverse skills and maintaining stable learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces critic networks as intermediary components between the policy and multiple reward functions. These critics act as mediators that translate different reward signals into standardized value estimates, enabling the policy to learn from multiple objectives simultaneously without direct conflict between reward functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the state space is expanded to cover continuous positions and orientations, then the robot can operate in more complex environments, but the search space becomes too large for efficient exploration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental operation capabilityVSAvoidskill discovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using curiosity-driven exploration to proactively discover important states and transitions before formal skill learning begins. This preliminary exploration phase identifies key regions in the continuous state space, allowing subsequent skill learning to focus on these pre-identified areas rather than searching the entire space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the continuous state space problem by introducing a discrete skill representation dimension. Instead of directly learning continuous control policies, the system learns discrete skill transitions that map continuous states to skill identifiers, effectively reducing the computational complexity of exploring continuous spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If exploration is encouraged to discover new skills, then the robot finds more manipulation strategies, but safety constraints may be violated during exploration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill repertoireVSAvoidsafety constraint violations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by using safety critics that are trained in advance to recognize unsafe states and transitions. These safety critics provide protective feedback during exploration, cushioning against harmful actions before they can cause damage, while still allowing beneficial exploration to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of unsafe exploration into benefit by using safety violations as learning signals. The safety critics identify violated constraints and use this information to guide the policy toward safer regions of the state space, transforming harmful exploration attempts into constructive learning opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS20250370432A1Systems and methods for skill learning with multiple critics
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 NAVER CORP
  • US20250370432A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370432A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370432A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for determining a policy to recommend transition in a position-representing space for a robotic device using a multi-critic architecture. To learn policy in a multi-critic architecture, a set of critics is defined pertaining to a position-representing space where each critic corresponds to a different objective function such as reach-reward, discovery-reward, and safety-reward. For each one of the critics of the set of critics, a learned value function in position-representing space is determined. The policy is learned based on the weighted feedback of the learned value functions to recommend transitions that are safe in the position-representing space. The multi-critic architecture minimizes interference between multiple reward functions and learns a safe and stable policy for the robotic device.