Multi-Diameter Disc Screen for MSW Separation Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Disc screens in the materials handling industry face challenges in effectively separating recyclable Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) into fiber materials, plastic containers, and metal containers, with existing designs experiencing wear and requiring frequent replacement, and lacking efficient mechanisms for handling diverse material shapes and sizes.

Innovation Solution

The use of multi-diameter disc assemblies with spacer discs and compound discs of varying diameters and materials, aligned in a stair-step configuration, creates constant InterFacial Openings and secondary slots to separate materials, with the large diameter discs absorbing initial contact and wear, while the spacer discs are made of harder materials to reduce wear and allow for larger shafts, reducing material usage and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If discs are made of softer material to handle diverse material shapes and sizes, then adaptability improves, but wear resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle diverse material shapes and sizesVSAvoiddisc wear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The disc assembly is segmented into multiple discs with different materials and diameters. Large diameter discs made of softer, more adaptable material handle diverse material shapes and sizes, while smaller spacer discs made of harder material provide wear resistance and maintain spacing. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the disc assembly have different material properties. The large diameter discs use softer material for adaptability, while the spacer discs use harder material for wear resistance. This local differentiation of material quality optimizes both adaptability and reliability in their respective functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform discs are used throughout the screen, then manufacturing simplicity improves, but separation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisc manufacturing uniformityVSAvoidmaterial separation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The screen is divided into multiple disc assemblies with different disc diameters (large, intermediate, small). This segmentation creates variable slot sizes that improve separation efficiency for different material types while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing processes for each disc type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Discs of asymmetric diameters are used throughout the screen rather than uniform discs. The large diameter discs create larger openings for bulky items, while smaller discs create tighter slots for smaller materials. This asymmetric configuration optimizes separation efficiency across different material size ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of manufacture

If smaller shafts are used to reduce costs, then manufacturing costs improve, but disc alignment and spacing stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft manufacturing costVSAvoiddisc spacing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The shaft system is segmented into multiple smaller shafts rather than one large shaft. Each shaft supports specific disc assemblies and can be optimized independently. This allows use of appropriately sized shafts that provide sufficient stability without excessive cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Spacer discs serve as intermediary elements that maintain consistent spacing between large diameter discs and the shaft. These spacer discs transfer and distribute forces evenly, ensuring stable disc positioning even with smaller, more cost-effective shafts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If larger shafts are used to improve disc support and reduce wear, then reliability improves, but material usage and manufacturing costs worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisc support and wear resistanceVSAvoidshaft material usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The support function is segmented between multiple smaller shafts and the spacer discs. Rather than relying on one large shaft for all support, the system distributes support functions across multiple components, reducing total material usage while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spacer discs serve dual functions: maintaining disc spacing and providing structural support to the shaft system. This self-service capability of the spacer discs reduces the burden on the shafts, allowing smaller, more material-efficient shaft designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2656926B1Disc for a material separation screen and material processing system comprising a plurality of such discs
Publication Date: 2016.03.23 EMERGING ACQUISITIONS LLC
  • EP2656926B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2656926B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2656926B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A material separation screen includes a number of discs (130), each disc comprising a first and a second section (132A, 132B) wherein each section has a coupling end (143) and an interlocking end (133) where the first interlocking end slidingly interlocks with the second interlocking end and wherein the first and second sections are configured to form multiple arched sides when attached together around a shaft.