Multi-Dimension Incident Recommendation for Network Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network operations face low accuracy in recommending similar incidents due to single-dimension comparison, leading to ineffective reference solutions for maintenance personnel.

Innovation Solution

A method for recommending similar incidents through multi-dimension comparison, involving obtaining alarm information, extracting M-dimensional incident diagnosis information, calculating similarity degrees, and filtering historical incidents to provide accurate references for network maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If single-dimension comparison is used to recommend similar incidents, then the system complexity is low, but the recommendation accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from single-dimension comparison (alarm proportion only) to multi-dimension comparison by introducing additional dimensions such as alarm type, affected service, network element, and time characteristics. This dimensional expansion enables more accurate incident similarity assessment while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured comparison frameworks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the incident comparison process into distinct dimensional components (alarm dimension, service dimension, network element dimension, time dimension). Each dimension is evaluated separately and then integrated to form a comprehensive similarity assessment, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multi-dimension comparison is used to recommend similar incidents, then the recommendation accuracy is improved, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex multi-dimension comparison into separable dimensional evaluations. Each dimension (alarm, service, network element, time) is processed independently using standardized comparison rules, then results are aggregated. This segmentation reduces calculation complexity by avoiding monolithic multi-parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative incident characteristics into quantifiable parameters suitable for computational comparison. By defining specific measurement parameters for each dimension (e.g., alarm type matching, service impact correlation, time window overlap), the system enables efficient calculation while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If monitoring personnel process each incident independently without knowledge accumulation, then the system is simple to operate, but the network maintenance efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork maintenance efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where historical incident data and resolution outcomes are continuously accumulated and fed back into the recommendation system. This creates a learning loop that improves recommendation accuracy over time, enhancing maintenance efficiency while the system autonomously manages the increasing complexity of knowledge accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to automatically accumulate and organize incident knowledge without requiring manual intervention for each new incident. The system self-services by automatically comparing new incidents against historical data, generating recommendations, and updating its knowledge base, thereby improving efficiency while keeping operational complexity low for human personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11757701B2Method for recommending similar incident, and related device
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US11757701B2 patent drawing
  • US11757701B2 patent drawing
  • US11757701B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for recommending a similar incident in operations technologies and a related device are provided. The method includes: obtaining alarm information of a to-be-processed incident; obtaining incident diagnosis information of M dimensions based on the alarm information, wherein the M dimensions include M different perspectives of incident diagnosis, and M is an integer greater than 1; performing processing based on the incident diagnosis information of the M dimensions, to obtain a feature of the to-be-processed incident; obtaining a plurality of similarity degrees through calculation based on the feature of the to-be-processed incident and features of a plurality of historical incidents, wherein the plurality of similarity degrees represent respective similarity degrees between the to-be-processed incident and the plurality of historical incidents; and obtaining a similar incident from the plurality of historical incidents through filtering based on the plurality of similarity degrees, and recommending the similar incident.