Multi-dimensional optimization for controlling environmental maintenance modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current HVAC systems in data centers operate inefficiently due to lack of real-time monitoring of server temperatures and reliance on redundant units, leading to energy wastage and difficulty in optimizing actuator operation levels amidst numerous constraints and dimensions.

Innovation Solution

A method using a predictor model to analyze changes in sensor values and operation levels of HVAC units, identifying optimal changes that maintain desired temperature ranges while minimizing energy consumption by spanning an N-dimensional space and applying a cost function that incorporates energy usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If redundant HVAC units are operated continuously to ensure server cooling, then reliability of temperature control is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control reliabilityVSAvoidHVAC energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts HVAC unit operation based on real-time server temperature monitoring. Instead of continuous operation, units are activated or deactivated according to actual thermal conditions, allowing the system to maintain reliability while reducing energy consumption during periods when full redundancy is not needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring server temperatures and using this information to adjust HVAC operation. Temperature sensors provide real-time data that feeds into the control algorithm, which then determines optimal HVAC unit activation to maintain temperature reliability while minimizing energy use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If manual control of redundant HVAC units is used to save energy, then energy consumption is reduced, but risk of overheating increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHVAC energy consumptionVSAvoidtemperature control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual control with automated feedback-based control that continuously monitors server temperatures and adjusts HVAC operation accordingly. This eliminates the risk of overheating associated with manual control while maintaining energy savings through intelligent activation/deactivation of redundant units based on real-time thermal conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If decentralized stand-alone controls are used for each HVAC unit, then system complexity is reduced, but optimization capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges decentralized HVAC controls with a centralized optimization layer that coordinates unit activation based on server temperature data. Individual HVAC units maintain their simple stand-alone controls, while a central controller optimizes their operation to improve cooling efficiency without significantly increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If the number of HVAC actuators and operation levels increases, then control precision is improved, but optimization difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidoptimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the optimization problem by treating each HVAC unit and its operation levels as discrete controllable elements. The optimization algorithm evaluates combinations of segmented actuators and their operation levels to find optimal configurations that achieve precise temperature control while managing the complexity of the multidimensional optimization space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2820488B1Multi-dimensional optimization for controlling environmental maintenance modules
Publication Date: 2019.09.04 VIGILENT CORP
  • EP2820488B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2820488B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2820488B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses are provided for controlling an environmental maintenance system that includes a plurality of sensors and a plurality of actuators. The operation levels of the actuators can be determined by optimizing a cost function subject to a constraint, e.g., having no more than a certain number of sensors that are out of range. A predictor model can predict whether certain operation levels of the actuators violate the constraint. The search for acceptable operation levels (i.e., ones that do not violate constraints) can be performed by analyzing points on lines in an N-dimensional space, where N is the number of actuators. The subset of acceptable operation levels along with a cost function (e.g., that incorporates energy consumption information) can be used to change operation levels of the modules to keep the temperatures within a desired range while using minimal energy.