Multi-Display Gaming Terminal for Remote Secondary Player Betting
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing gaming systems do not adequately support secondary players who wish to place bets on games played by primary players remotely and view game information without directly participating.
Innovation Solution
A terminal equipped with multiple displays, input devices, and communication channels allows secondary players to customize window arrangements, access game feeds, and communicate with primary players or casino representatives, enabling remote participation and enhanced viewing experiences.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If a terminal with multiple displays and customizable window arrangements is provided, then the viewing experience and engagement of secondary players are enhanced, but the device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The terminal system is segmented into multiple independent displays, each capable of showing different game feeds or information. Secondary players can customize window arrangements on each display independently, allowing them to view multiple games simultaneously without overwhelming complexity in a single interface.
Solution Approach 2:
The system transitions from a single-view perspective to a multi-dimensional viewing experience by utilizing multiple displays arranged in different spatial configurations. Secondary players can position game feeds, player statistics, and betting information across different displays, creating a comprehensive overview without complicating individual display interfaces.
2Adaptability or versatility
If secondary players can place bets and communicate with primary players remotely, then their participation and engagement are improved, but the communication infrastructure complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The terminal system provides universal access to multiple game tables and primary players through a single interface. Secondary players can place bets on any visible game feed and communicate with any primary player through the same communication channel, eliminating the need for separate systems for different functions.
Solution Approach 2:
The terminal acts as an intermediary between secondary players and primary players, managing all communication and betting interactions through a centralized system. This mediator approach simplifies the infrastructure by consolidating multiple communication pathways into a single managed interface.
3Loss of information
If multiple game feeds and player statistics are displayed simultaneously, then information availability is improved, but the information processing and display complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Information is segmented and distributed across multiple displays rather than consolidated on a single screen. Each display can show specific game feeds, player statistics, or betting information independently, allowing secondary players to access comprehensive information without overwhelming any single interface.
Solution Approach 2:
The display system is dynamic and adaptable, allowing secondary players to customize window arrangements, resize displays, and reposition information elements based on their viewing preferences. This dynamic configuration capability enables comprehensive information display while maintaining interface simplicity through user-controlled organization.
Data Source
AI summary
In various embodiments, a first player may follow the same pattern of betting used by a second player.