Multi-Distant Weighted Scoring for Biometric Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing biometric authentication methods face challenges in accurately distinguishing authorized users from impostors due to high false acceptance and rejection rates, particularly when relying on behavioral data that is not repeatable and varies significantly across different interactions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pairwise comparisons of biometric samples against templates, using allowable variability ranges, nonlinear transformations, and weighted scoring to determine whether a sample corresponds to the same user as the template, by calculating proportions of successful matches across multiple scaling factors and applying these through specific mathematical equations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If simple statistical methods or neural networks are used to compare biometric samples, then the system is easier to implement without special hardware, but the false acceptance and rejection rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidauthentication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The comparison process is divided into multiple independent stages: initial distance calculation, binary comparison at multiple scaling factors, proportion computation, nonlinear transformation, and weighted scoring. Each stage processes specific aspects of the biometric data independently, allowing complex authentication to be broken down into manageable steps that maintain high accuracy without requiring specialized hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple scaling factors (different dimensional perspectives) to compare the same biometric sample against the template. By evaluating distances at various scaling dimensions and combining results through weighted scoring, the system captures behavioral patterns from multiple angles, significantly improving authentication reliability while remaining implementable on standard computers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If behavioral biometric data is used for authentication, then no special hardware is required, but the data is not repeatable and varies significantly across interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware independenceVSAvoiddata repeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the allowable variability ranges for each biometric element based on the specific sample being analyzed. Rather than using fixed thresholds, the method computes scaling factors and weighted scores that adapt to the natural variation in behavioral data, allowing the authentication system to accommodate legitimate variations in user behavior while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the raw biometric data through multiple parameter changes: calculating distances at different scaling factors, applying nonlinear transformations to proportion values, and computing weighted sums. These parameter transformations convert unstable, variable behavioral data into a stable scoring system that reliably distinguishes authorized users from impostors despite natural variations in typing patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7526412B2Method and apparatus for multi-distant weighted scoring system
Publication Date: 2009.04.28 CONCENTRIX SREV INC
  • US7526412B2 patent drawing
  • US7526412B2 patent drawing
  • US7526412B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of comparing a plurality of measurements to a template are described. Measurements are compared piecewise (element-by-element) and a proportion of successful comparisons at each of a plurality of distance scaling factors is calculated. The proportions are subjected to a nonlinear transformation, then normalized and combined into a weighted sum. The weighted sum is compared with a threshold value to establish the result of the comparison. Software and systems to implement embodiments of the invention are also described and claimed.