Multi-Domain Chip Authentication Using Intrinsic Identifiers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Counterfeit electronic components pose a significant threat due to their ability to jeopardize the performance and reliability of products, and existing methods for chip authentication, such as physical unclonable functions (PUFs), face challenges like intrinsic identifiers changing over time due to stress and aging.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-domain approach within integrated circuit chips, where multiple domains are established during manufacturing, and identification strings from these domains are recorded and verified during authentication, ensuring that even if some domains change, at least one remains authentic, using retention bitmaps as intrinsic identifiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single intrinsic identifier is used for chip authentication, then the authentication process is simple, but the identifier may change over time due to stress and aging, compromising reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication process complexityVSAvoidauthentication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The chip is divided into multiple domains, each containing its own intrinsic identifier. Instead of relying on a single identifier that may change over time, the system segments the authentication function across multiple independent domains. This segmentation ensures that if one domain's identifier changes, other domains can still provide valid authentication, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple intrinsic identifiers from multiple domains are recorded and verified, then the authentication reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system records identification strings from multiple domains during manufacturing, but during authentication, it only requires a subset of these domains to match. This partial action approach provides redundancy without requiring all domains to be verified, thus improving reliability while controlling the increase in system complexity. The authentication succeeds if at least one domain's identifier matches, rather than requiring all domains to match.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If all identification strings from all domains must match for authentication, then the security is maximized, but the probability of successful authentication decreases due to potential changes over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against counterfeitVSAvoidauthentication success probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system does not require all identification strings to match, but rather a subset of them. This partial verification approach maintains security by requiring multiple matches while increasing the probability of successful authentication by allowing some domains to change without preventing authentication. The system strikes a balance between security and reliability by requiring a threshold number of matches rather than all matches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9202040B2Chip authentication using multi-domain intrinsic identifiers
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US9202040B2 patent drawing
  • US9202040B2 patent drawing
  • US9202040B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide a chip authentication system using multi-domain intrinsic identifiers. Multiple intrinsic identifiers taken from multiple domains (areas or sections of the chip) are compared against the intrinsic identifiers collected during the manufacture of the chip. If at least one intrinsic identifier matches those collected during manufacture, the chip may be designated as authentic.