Neural Response Measurement via Multi-Electrode Propagation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neuromodulation systems face challenges in accurately measuring and controlling neural responses to stimuli due to electrode migration, postural changes, and recruitment of unwanted fibre classes, leading to ineffective or painful stimulation.

Innovation Solution

A method and device using multiple electrodes positioned along a neural pathway to record and compare neural responses, determining propagation properties and fibre class recruitment by adjusting stimulus timing and amplitude to selectively recruit desired fibre classes, thereby improving signal quality and reducing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple electrodes are used to record and compare neural responses, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural response measurement precisionVSAvoidelectrode array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The neural pathway is divided into multiple recording segments using several electrodes positioned at different locations. Each electrode records the neural response locally, and by comparing these segmented recordings, the system achieves more precise measurement of propagation properties while isolating the effect of electrode migration to specific segments rather than the entire measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple electrode recordings are combined through comparison and integration to derive propagation properties. By merging the information from multiple electrodes, the system achieves enhanced measurement precision that compensates for the increased device complexity, as the combined data provides more robust measurement against migration effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If stimulus amplitude is increased to recruit more fibres, then neural response strength is improved, but harmful factors increase due to recruitment of unwanted fibre classes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural response strengthVSAvoidunwanted side effects from fibre recruitment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different stimulus characteristics to different spatial locations along the neural pathway by using multiple electrodes. By analyzing the local response at each electrode position, the system can identify which fibre classes are being recruited at specific locations and adjust stimulation to achieve desired neural response strength while avoiding harmful recruitment of unwanted fibre classes in sensitive areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the recorded neural responses from multiple electrodes as feedback to adjust and optimize stimulus parameters. By monitoring the actual neural response and comparing it against desired outcomes, the feedback mechanism allows real-time adjustment of stimulus amplitude and timing to maintain reliable neural response while preventing harmful side effects from excessive fibre recruitment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If stimulus is applied continuously to sustain pain relief, then therapeutic effect is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief effectivenessVSAvoidpower source consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous stimulation, the system uses periodic or pulsed stimulation patterns where stimuli are applied intermittently. The multiple electrodes monitor neural response propagation, and stimulation is delivered in controlled pulses only when needed to maintain therapeutic effect. This periodic action maintains pain relief reliability while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous stimulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the neural response measurements from multiple electrodes to automatically determine when stimulation is needed, enabling the device to self-regulate its operation. By monitoring propagation properties and neural response strength, the system can autonomously adjust stimulation timing and duration, maintaining therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing energy consumption through intelligent, demand-based stimulation delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the precision of neural recruitment, reduces unwanted side effects, and maintains effective and comfortable stimulation by selectively amplifying specific fibre class responses, improving signal-to-noise ratio and allowing for real-time feedback control.

Implementation Method 1

making a first recording of a neural response evoked by the stimulus using a first sense electrode; and making a second recording of the neural response evoked by the stimulus using a second sense electrode spaced apart from the first electrode along a neural pathway

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical potential detection: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS10588524B2Method and apparatus for measurement of neural response
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
  • US10588524B2 patent drawing
  • US10588524B2 patent drawing
  • US10588524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for measuring a neural response evoked by a stimulus. First and second sense electrodes are positioned at distinct locations along a neural pathway. A neural stimulus is applied and first and second recordings of a neural response evoked by the stimulus are obtained from the respective sense electrodes. The first recording and the second recording are compared to determine propagation properties of the evoked neural response.