Simultaneous Multi-Event Kriging for Groundwater Trend Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for mapping groundwater movement near managed aquifer recharge facilities and groundwater pump-and-treat systems are limited by their inability to effectively handle spatio-temporal data sets, leading to inconsistent trend coefficient estimates and inaccurate hydraulic capture zone assessments due to sequential processing of events.

Innovation Solution

The development of simultaneous multi-event universal kriging (MEUK) method, which constructs a block-diagonal kriging matrix to condition trend coefficients across multiple events, allowing for physically-based interpolation of groundwater pressures and flow patterns over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If sequential processing of events is used to map groundwater movement, then each event can be processed independently, but inconsistent trend coefficient estimates and inaccurate hydraulic capture zone assessments occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of processingVSAvoidaccuracy of trend coefficient estimates
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple event-specific kriging systems into a single unified simultaneous multi-event kriging framework. By merging the processing of multiple events and conditioning trend coefficients across all events together rather than sequentially, the method achieves consistent trend coefficient estimates while maintaining computational feasibility through the block-diagonal matrix structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If data acquisition frequency is increased to improve monitoring accuracy, then more detailed groundwater pressure data is obtained, but monitoring costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of groundwater pressure dataVSAvoidmonitoring cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary conditioning of trend coefficients across multiple events using the simultaneous multi-event kriging framework. By pre-conditioning the data using all available events together before generating maps, the method extracts maximum information from existing data, reducing the need for additional frequent data acquisition and thereby lowering monitoring costs while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If event-specific kriging systems are used for each time occasion, then computational simplicity is maintained, but sufficient data may not exist for each event to estimate trend coefficients and residual semi-variogram

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidreliability of kriging estimates
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple event-specific kriging systems into a unified simultaneous multi-event kriging framework with a block-diagonal matrix structure. This approach pools data across all events to estimate common trend coefficients, ensuring reliable estimates even when individual events have insufficient data, while maintaining computational efficiency through the structured matrix formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10371860B2Simultaneous multi-event universal kriging methods for spatio-temporal data analysis and mapping
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 S S PAPADOPULOS & ASSOC
  • US10371860B2 patent drawing
  • US10371860B2 patent drawing
  • US10371860B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods configured to create contour maps of geospatial variables based on hydrometeorological data associated with the variable are described herein. The systems and methods advantageously use simultaneous multi-event universal kriging for spatio-temporal data exploration, analysis and interpolation with the objective of creating a series of related maps, where each map corresponds to a specific sampling event, but wherein some features exhibit spatial relationships persisting over time. In one particular example, water level maps are prepared using the methods, which has the flexibility to allow the conditioning of trend coefficients based on any arbitrary subsets of sample data, and thereby provides a physically based and deterministic rather than wholly-stochastic basis for depicting hydrometeorological data correlations in space and time. The simultaneous MEUK method borrows strength from events possessing a large number of samples to map events possessing fewer data, and allows for implementing “wheel and axle” data analysis.