Multi-Feature Quality Evaluation Model for Enterprise Knowledge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing knowledge recommendation systems in enterprises face challenges in accurately evaluating the quality of knowledge documents, often recommending low-quality content due to the uneven quality of internal documents and the lack of effective multi-dimensional feature analysis.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for constructing a quality evaluation model that acquires knowledge content samples in various forms, extracts statistical, semantic, and image features, and constructs a quality evaluation model to accurately recommend high-quality knowledge by utilizing these multi-dimensional features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If statistical features only are used for knowledge quality evaluation, then the evaluation process is simple, but the recommendation accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process complexityVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from single-dimensional statistical feature evaluation to multi-dimensional feature evaluation by incorporating semantic features (text understanding), image features (visual content analysis), and statistical features. This dimensional expansion enables comprehensive quality assessment of knowledge documents, resolving the contradiction between evaluation simplicity and recommendation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite evaluation model that integrates multiple feature types (statistical, semantic, image) analogous to composite materials. Each feature type contributes different evaluation dimensions, and their combination produces a more accurate and robust quality assessment than any single feature type alone, thereby improving recommendation accuracy while maintaining systematic evaluation structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If multi-dimensional features are extracted and used, then the recommendation accuracy is improved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the knowledge document processing into distinct feature extraction modules: statistical feature extraction, semantic feature extraction, and image feature extraction. Each module handles a specific type of feature independently, which organizes the complex processing task into manageable segments. This segmentation reduces processing complexity by providing clear modular boundaries while maintaining the benefits of multi-dimensional feature analysis for accurate recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11797607B2Method and apparatus for constructing quality evaluation model, device and storage medium
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 BEIJING BAIDU NETCOM SCI & TECH CO LTD
  • US11797607B2 patent drawing
  • US11797607B2 patent drawing
  • US11797607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure disclose a method and apparatus for constructing a quality evaluation model, an electronic device and a computer-readable storage medium. A specific implementation mode of the method comprises: acquiring samples of knowledge contents; extracting statistical features, semantic features, and image features respectively from the samples of knowledge contents; and constructing a quality evaluation model for knowledge according to the statistical features, the semantic features, and the image features. On the basis of the prior art, this implementation mode additionally uses semantic features and image features of knowledge contents to construct a more accurate quality evaluation model based on multi-dimensional features that characterize the actual quality of a knowledge, which may well discover some brief but very useful summary knowledge in an enterprise and may recommend high-quality knowledge more accurately for employees in the enterprise.