Multi-Finger Movable Contact Layout for Compact High-Current Breakers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing circuit breakers face limitations in supporting higher electrical currents and reducing contact heating while adhering to space constraints, primarily due to the compromise between the number of fingers and dimensions of the breaking chamber, leading to insufficient performance in industrial applications.

Innovation Solution

A movable contact design with six fingers, each 6 mm wide and spaced 1.3 mm apart, incorporating stainless steel separating elements to enhance contact area and reduce heating, maintaining chamber size constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of fingers is increased to optimize contact area, then electrical current carrying capacity is improved, but the width of each finger must be reduced which can degrade the quality of the fixed contact surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact areaVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The movable contact is divided into multiple fingers (at least three) that are substantially parallel to each other, allowing the total contact area to be increased while maintaining reasonable dimensions for each individual finger. This segmentation enables the contact surface to be distributed across multiple smaller contact points rather than one large surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fingers are arranged in a substantially parallel configuration extending in the vertical direction rather than spreading horizontally. This vertical arrangement allows multiple fingers to occupy the same horizontal footprint, effectively increasing contact area without proportionally increasing the overall width of the movable contact assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If the number of fingers is increased to support higher electrical currents, then interrupting capacity is improved, but the breaking chamber dimensions become constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical current capacityVSAvoidbreaking chamber size
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The parallel vertical arrangement of fingers allows the movable contact to achieve greater electrical current capacity without proportionally increasing the horizontal width. By stacking fingers vertically rather than spreading them horizontally, the design fits within constrained breaking chamber dimensions while maintaining high current carrying capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Each finger is designed with specific local characteristics (width of 3 to 8 mm, spacing of 1 to 3 mm) that optimize both current distribution and spatial efficiency. The localized dimensions of individual fingers are carefully controlled to ensure adequate current capacity while maintaining compact overall geometry suitable for standard breaking chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of moving object

If finger width is reduced to accommodate more fingers, then contact area is optimized, but the bearing surface for each finger becomes small leading to surface degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal contact areaVSAvoidsurface degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The total contact area is segmented into multiple discrete finger contacts rather than one large continuous surface. This segmentation allows the total area to be sufficient for high current capacity while each individual finger maintains adequate dimensions (3 to 8 mm width) to distribute pressure and prevent surface degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each finger is designed with locally optimized dimensions that balance total contact area requirements with individual finger strength. The width of each finger (3 to 8 mm) and spacing (1 to 3 mm) are carefully controlled to ensure adequate bearing surface area on each finger to support the mechanical and electrical loads without degrading the fixed contact surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design increases the interrupting capacity to 55 kA and reduces contact heating by 5K, optimizing electrical performance without altering the breaking chamber dimensions.

Implementation Method 1

Both the fixed and movable contacts have surfaces designed to bear against each other to ensure the passage of electrical current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

the moving contact incorporates separating elements at its inter-finger spaces. These elements are essential components for maintaining the individual fingers of the moving contact in parallel orientations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP4338180B1Movable contact configured to be integrated into a circuit breaker
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 HAGER ELECTRO SAS
  • EP4338180B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4338180B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The subject of the present invention relates to a movable contact configured to be integrated into a circuit breaker and bearing against a fixed contact in the vicinity of an arc extinguishing chamber, the movable contact having the form of a plurality of fingers (2) juxtaposed in a substantially parallel manner and aligned with one another and joined by one of their ends (2a) to a common trunk, characterized in that the inter-digital spaces separating the respective surfaces of two juxtaposed fingers (2) of the movable contact have a spacing width with a value equal to or less than 1.3 millimetres.